Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
5 star guys versus 0 star guys
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tech_wreck47" data-source="post: 274684" data-attributes="member: 2346"><p>I see what you are saying now, I didn't get that from your first comment. But imo the guys rating players miss but they are right on just as much if not more than they are wrong. Prof is in the pudding, Alabama, Ohio state, Michigan, FSU, Clemson ect. And a lot of the times we see a guy that was a 2 or 3 star turn into a all star and we take that as the services being wrong, but at the time they could have been right and that kid might have hit a growth spurt, got stronger and better coaching ect but it still took them to their 3rd or 4th year to get to that all star level. I don't take that as the recruiting services being wrong. GT is a prime example, we get kids that take 3 and 4 years to get consistently good and end up being 4 or 5 star talent but at the time in highschool they were just that 2 or 3 star, difference is they trained hard, but most of all the coaching was way better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tech_wreck47, post: 274684, member: 2346"] I see what you are saying now, I didn't get that from your first comment. But imo the guys rating players miss but they are right on just as much if not more than they are wrong. Prof is in the pudding, Alabama, Ohio state, Michigan, FSU, Clemson ect. And a lot of the times we see a guy that was a 2 or 3 star turn into a all star and we take that as the services being wrong, but at the time they could have been right and that kid might have hit a growth spurt, got stronger and better coaching ect but it still took them to their 3rd or 4th year to get to that all star level. I don't take that as the recruiting services being wrong. GT is a prime example, we get kids that take 3 and 4 years to get consistently good and end up being 4 or 5 star talent but at the time in highschool they were just that 2 or 3 star, difference is they trained hard, but most of all the coaching was way better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
5 star guys versus 0 star guys
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top