Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
5 Games in: Observations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 641411" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>I’ve seen the assertion a few times that Collins or Stansbury intends for us to outrecruit Bama and UGA. I see a countering assertion that we can keep recruiting like we have been and coach the players up. I think there’s a middle ground, and I think it’s what Collins is aiming for</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Recruit in the top 30. Get close enough to the top to be able to make up the difference with other factors.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Have an A+ Strength and Conditioning team to cover that gap</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Make sure players know that hard work will get rewarded with playing time, so that you can train and recruit for depth. That’s what ATL is for.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Make sure recruits know that you’ll showcase them for the NFL so that the players with NFL dreams will come here</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Solid position coaching so that players develop the skills to elevate their game</li> </ol><p>We’ve seen 1-4 clearly (we’ve seen arguments around #1). We’ve seen #5 for DBs, which is one of the quicker places for technique coaching to show up. S&C will take longer to catch us up on the lines. QB coaching is taking time to show, partially because Graham wasn’t getting a lot of reps and football study over the winter, spring, and summer. It’s hard for the receivers to look good before the QB does.</p><p>OL technique and execution is worrisome right now. Depth and size and injuries are factors, but it’s still bad with those considerations.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 641411, member: 282"] I’ve seen the assertion a few times that Collins or Stansbury intends for us to outrecruit Bama and UGA. I see a countering assertion that we can keep recruiting like we have been and coach the players up. I think there’s a middle ground, and I think it’s what Collins is aiming for [LIST=1] [*]Recruit in the top 30. Get close enough to the top to be able to make up the difference with other factors. [*]Have an A+ Strength and Conditioning team to cover that gap [*]Make sure players know that hard work will get rewarded with playing time, so that you can train and recruit for depth. That’s what ATL is for. [*]Make sure recruits know that you’ll showcase them for the NFL so that the players with NFL dreams will come here [*]Solid position coaching so that players develop the skills to elevate their game [/LIST] We’ve seen 1-4 clearly (we’ve seen arguments around #1). We’ve seen #5 for DBs, which is one of the quicker places for technique coaching to show up. S&C will take longer to catch us up on the lines. QB coaching is taking time to show, partially because Graham wasn’t getting a lot of reps and football study over the winter, spring, and summer. It’s hard for the receivers to look good before the QB does. OL technique and execution is worrisome right now. Depth and size and injuries are factors, but it’s still bad with those considerations. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who won the ACC Coach of the Year Award in 2014?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
5 Games in: Observations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top