Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
2023 General NCAA Football News
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MWBATL" data-source="post: 952000" data-attributes="member: 944"><p>Whole thing sounds….odd. It was players hazing younger players. No coaches or staff involved. The “sexual acts” were… somewhat odd and marginal, such as forcing the young player to stand naked in the shower and turn round and round so he’d bump into other players. I don’t know that I would call that sexual, per se. </p><p></p><p>Little doubt that Fitzgerald will be paid tons. A six month investigation found no evidence that he knew about the hazing. He was fired because he “should have known” (or more likely they believed he knew but could not prove it). </p><p></p><p>AD and President held a team meeting to tell the team about the firing. One was traveling and didn’t bother to show. The other appeared by zoom, spoke briefly and took no questions. The team seems VERY unhappy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MWBATL, post: 952000, member: 944"] Whole thing sounds….odd. It was players hazing younger players. No coaches or staff involved. The “sexual acts” were… somewhat odd and marginal, such as forcing the young player to stand naked in the shower and turn round and round so he’d bump into other players. I don’t know that I would call that sexual, per se. Little doubt that Fitzgerald will be paid tons. A six month investigation found no evidence that he knew about the hazing. He was fired because he “should have known” (or more likely they believed he knew but could not prove it). AD and President held a team meeting to tell the team about the firing. One was traveling and didn’t bother to show. The other appeared by zoom, spoke briefly and took no questions. The team seems VERY unhappy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
2023 General NCAA Football News
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top