Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2023 ACC News & Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTrob21" data-source="post: 936758" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>This is insane, you can watch the FSU AD present his case. He uses past ACC revenue numbers compared to future SEC and B1G projections... And the entire board just sat there...Nobody said anything.</p><p></p><p>This is exactly how really stupid business decisions get made. A CEO calls a board meeting, and all those people just sit there an nod their heads and an utterly ridiculous proposal. This, friends, is how you get Clear Pepsi... </p><p></p><p> I have said it before and I will say it now even louder. </p><p></p><p>If FSU wants to go, let them Go... they would be trading the ACC, which is the clear number 3 conference in revenue and with a real distinct pathway to the national championship to go to the SEC, and be what the 7th best program. They will be 7-6, 8-5, most years, have no shot at making the playoffs, and will go to the music city bowl.</p><p></p><p>And all of that for 20 million more a year, which you will spend on coaches and facilities. Great decision.</p><p></p><p>Even with the SEC money, they aren't getting close to the Alabama, LSU, and UGAs of the world. And now with Texas in the SEC...good luck Noles. Take Clemson with you if they want to complain as well. </p><p></p><p>Clemson would quickly become an Ole miss type of program.</p><p></p><p>I hope the ACC quickly solidifies the PAC/ACC alignment, and from there it's game over. The ACC will be number 3, and when the B1G takes whomever, and the SEC takes whomever, the ACC will still have enough brands to get a larger deal than the Big 12.</p><p></p><p>It will be in my opinion</p><p></p><p>1) B1G, I think they have out-maneuvered the SEC, they have bigger population centers, and cover more time zones to maximize ad revenue. Their big brands draw close if not better than the SEC brands. I think they will go East for expansion and pick up southern states that are growing.</p><p>2) SEC, they will be number 1 in championships, but a close number 2 in payouts. Especially if they double-dip and get teams like FSU and Clemson.</p><p></p><p>3A) ACC, after the raids of SEC and B1G, I still think they will be slightly better than the B12, but that could change</p><p>3B) B12, they have already had their brands raided, and have settled into the new reality of college football.</p><p></p><p>I can only pray that this realignment stuff gets done quickly. I'm losing interest in "college" sports.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTrob21, post: 936758, member: 84"] This is insane, you can watch the FSU AD present his case. He uses past ACC revenue numbers compared to future SEC and B1G projections... And the entire board just sat there...Nobody said anything. This is exactly how really stupid business decisions get made. A CEO calls a board meeting, and all those people just sit there an nod their heads and an utterly ridiculous proposal. This, friends, is how you get Clear Pepsi... I have said it before and I will say it now even louder. If FSU wants to go, let them Go... they would be trading the ACC, which is the clear number 3 conference in revenue and with a real distinct pathway to the national championship to go to the SEC, and be what the 7th best program. They will be 7-6, 8-5, most years, have no shot at making the playoffs, and will go to the music city bowl. And all of that for 20 million more a year, which you will spend on coaches and facilities. Great decision. Even with the SEC money, they aren't getting close to the Alabama, LSU, and UGAs of the world. And now with Texas in the SEC...good luck Noles. Take Clemson with you if they want to complain as well. Clemson would quickly become an Ole miss type of program. I hope the ACC quickly solidifies the PAC/ACC alignment, and from there it's game over. The ACC will be number 3, and when the B1G takes whomever, and the SEC takes whomever, the ACC will still have enough brands to get a larger deal than the Big 12. It will be in my opinion 1) B1G, I think they have out-maneuvered the SEC, they have bigger population centers, and cover more time zones to maximize ad revenue. Their big brands draw close if not better than the SEC brands. I think they will go East for expansion and pick up southern states that are growing. 2) SEC, they will be number 1 in championships, but a close number 2 in payouts. Especially if they double-dip and get teams like FSU and Clemson. 3A) ACC, after the raids of SEC and B1G, I still think they will be slightly better than the B12, but that could change 3B) B12, they have already had their brands raided, and have settled into the new reality of college football. I can only pray that this realignment stuff gets done quickly. I'm losing interest in "college" sports. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2023 ACC News & Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top