Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
2023-2024 ROSTER???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 945455" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>The 1.2 attempts is only a comparison to Kelly. That is more like 4/8 per 100 when compared to Terry/Coleman who I think he is most likely competing with for playing time. Kelly was our highest eFG% of any wing/guard and so it made sense for him to shoot that much. That isn't really the case with Reeves. I also don't think Coleman is tremendously ahead of Reeves in a vacuum. I think Coleman's style better compliments Kelly (and in general a more crowded back court) because he's more likely to be effective on a limited number of shots. However if Kelly were to stay in the draft, I think Reeves would be the one who took most of his minutes because then we'd be in need of someone to force the issue more. </p><p></p><p>And I don't think Reeve's issues are insurmountable. He has tremendous athleticism and it would be logical that he would get better shot selection that would help his efficiency go up (along with just making more shots if he really was just in a cold shooting slump) as he got more experience. I still think he'll play and be an important piece for us especially as a spark plug off the bench if the offense starts to stall, and as a driving force when Kelly is out. I don't think him, or anyone else, getting 10-15 mpg means they are bad. I think it means we have a very competitive back court which is a good thing, both for next year and for the years after. If our front court had a similar issue then we'd be a near lock for the NCAAT team to me. </p><p></p><p>The different coach and different system is a factor for everyone and will almost certainly play a role, however I don't know at this point how you would begin to try and determine which players would benefit more from CDS and his new system compared to whatever was in place before (whether here or elsewhere).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 945455, member: 2299"] The 1.2 attempts is only a comparison to Kelly. That is more like 4/8 per 100 when compared to Terry/Coleman who I think he is most likely competing with for playing time. Kelly was our highest eFG% of any wing/guard and so it made sense for him to shoot that much. That isn't really the case with Reeves. I also don't think Coleman is tremendously ahead of Reeves in a vacuum. I think Coleman's style better compliments Kelly (and in general a more crowded back court) because he's more likely to be effective on a limited number of shots. However if Kelly were to stay in the draft, I think Reeves would be the one who took most of his minutes because then we'd be in need of someone to force the issue more. And I don't think Reeve's issues are insurmountable. He has tremendous athleticism and it would be logical that he would get better shot selection that would help his efficiency go up (along with just making more shots if he really was just in a cold shooting slump) as he got more experience. I still think he'll play and be an important piece for us especially as a spark plug off the bench if the offense starts to stall, and as a driving force when Kelly is out. I don't think him, or anyone else, getting 10-15 mpg means they are bad. I think it means we have a very competitive back court which is a good thing, both for next year and for the years after. If our front court had a similar issue then we'd be a near lock for the NCAAT team to me. The different coach and different system is a factor for everyone and will almost certainly play a role, however I don't know at this point how you would begin to try and determine which players would benefit more from CDS and his new system compared to whatever was in place before (whether here or elsewhere). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
2023-2024 ROSTER???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top