Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 stats year in review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 857872" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Because I gave the Offensive Stuff Rate (x-axis) vs Power Success (y-axis), here's the DEFENSIVE version. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]11915[/ATTACH]</p><p>The farther to the right you are, the more you're getting behind the line of scrimmage. Well done, NCST. The further down you are in the chart, the more you're getting off the field on 3rd and 4th down (and short). Well done, NCST, again. </p><p></p><p>So, we bowed up really well on 3rd or 4th and short. But, we really weren't getting tackles for loss and sacks. We're on a strange part of the graph, being good in short yardage, but not so good at getting behind the line of scrimmage. Miami is the opposite--they make disruptive plays but give it up on 4th and 1. </p><p></p><p>Tip of the cap to Pitt, too. Good defense. </p><p></p><p>UVA and UNC and Syracuse and Duke fit into that "run on us--we won't stop you" class of defense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 857872, member: 282"] Because I gave the Offensive Stuff Rate (x-axis) vs Power Success (y-axis), here's the DEFENSIVE version. [ATTACH type="full"]11915[/ATTACH] The farther to the right you are, the more you're getting behind the line of scrimmage. Well done, NCST. The further down you are in the chart, the more you're getting off the field on 3rd and 4th down (and short). Well done, NCST, again. So, we bowed up really well on 3rd or 4th and short. But, we really weren't getting tackles for loss and sacks. We're on a strange part of the graph, being good in short yardage, but not so good at getting behind the line of scrimmage. Miami is the opposite--they make disruptive plays but give it up on 4th and 1. Tip of the cap to Pitt, too. Good defense. UVA and UNC and Syracuse and Duke fit into that "run on us--we won't stop you" class of defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 stats year in review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top