Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 stats year in review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 857849" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Here are some of our rushing stats:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><th></th><th>Offense</th><th>Defense</th></tr><tr><td>Power Success</td><td>78%</td><td>65%</td></tr><tr><td>Stuff Rate</td><td>16%</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Line Yards per Rush</td><td>3.1</td><td>3.3</td></tr><tr><td>Second Level Yards per Rush</td><td>1.2</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Open Field Yards per Rush</td><td><strong><u>2</u></strong></td><td>1.3</td></tr></table><p></p><p>If we got into the open field, we made hay. That highlighted "2" is a really good number, and it wants to say that our running backs were really good. How does this compare to the conference?</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><strong>Line Yards (x) vs Open Field Yards <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/thumbsup.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up (y)" data-shortname="(y)" /></strong></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]11909[/ATTACH]</p><p>For running, we're behind (to the left of) Duke and Syracuse and VT and Pitt, etc. I'm really kind of stunned to see Miami orphaned alone in the lower left (no wonder Manny got fired). We could run for some yards when we got free, and we're up high on the chart in that regard but being behind Duke and Clemson and VT in our ability to push for some yards isn't great. </p><p>I'm surprised to see us even fare this well on the x-axis, but I saw a lot of our RBs hit in the backfield and make it to the line of scrimmage or better. I don't have the stats to show it, but my eye test has this as a place where the RBs carried the team and brought the score up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 857849, member: 282"] Here are some of our rushing stats: [TABLE] [TR] [TH][/TH] [TH]Offense[/TH] [TH]Defense[/TH] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Power Success[/TD] [TD]78%[/TD] [TD]65%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Stuff Rate[/TD] [TD]16%[/TD] [TD]14%[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Line Yards per Rush[/TD] [TD]3.1[/TD] [TD]3.3[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Second Level Yards per Rush[/TD] [TD]1.2[/TD] [TD]1.1[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Open Field Yards per Rush[/TD] [TD][B][U]2[/U][/B][/TD] [TD]1.3[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] If we got into the open field, we made hay. That highlighted "2" is a really good number, and it wants to say that our running backs were really good. How does this compare to the conference? [CENTER][B]Line Yards (x) vs Open Field Yards (y)[/B][/CENTER] [ATTACH type="full"]11909[/ATTACH] For running, we're behind (to the left of) Duke and Syracuse and VT and Pitt, etc. I'm really kind of stunned to see Miami orphaned alone in the lower left (no wonder Manny got fired). We could run for some yards when we got free, and we're up high on the chart in that regard but being behind Duke and Clemson and VT in our ability to push for some yards isn't great. I'm surprised to see us even fare this well on the x-axis, but I saw a lot of our RBs hit in the backfield and make it to the line of scrimmage or better. I don't have the stats to show it, but my eye test has this as a place where the RBs carried the team and brought the score up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 stats year in review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top