Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 Recruiting Class & Transfers In
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 774395" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>29th was compared to last year's results which were a more standard year and so the impact of transfers across the board was likely much lower. Its by no means a perfect comparison but it's a good rough estimate.</p><p></p><p>As far as your sticking point goes, when you asked for it before, I did exactly that for every ACC team and you then proceeded to ignore it anyways. </p><p></p><p>FWIW here are the transfers and transfers above .85 for those ranked ahead of us nationally. I'm not going bother with ACC teams since I already did them. These are according to 247 so there could be those missing as pointed out before.</p><p></p><p>Bama - 0</p><p>OSU - 0</p><p>UGA - 0</p><p>LSU - 0</p><p>Oregon - 0</p><p>TAMU - 0</p><p>USC - 2 (2)</p><p>ND - 1 (1)</p><p>OU - 0</p><p>UF - 3 (2)</p><p>Mich - 1 (1)</p><p>Tenn - 1 (1)</p><p>Wisc - 0</p><p>Texas - 2 (0)</p><p>Maryland - 1 (1)</p><p>Miss - 1 (0)</p><p>Nebraska - 4 (2)</p><p>Ark - 2 (2)</p><p>PSU - 4 (2)</p><p>Minn - 5 (2)</p><p>Iowa - 1 (0)</p><p>Cal - 1 (1)</p><p>Mizz - 2 (2)</p><p>Utah - 4 (4)</p><p>Washington - 1 (1)</p><p>Miss St - 5 (1)</p><p>OkieSt - 4 (0)</p><p>WVU - 1 (1)</p><p>Kentucky - 1 (1)</p><p>MSU - 5 (3)</p><p>Rutgers - 4 (1)</p><p>Baylor - 3 (2)</p><p>Cinci - 2 (1)</p><p>Kansas - 1 (0)</p><p></p><p>Compared to GT - 7 (5) or 8(6) with Cochran although he isn't listed on 247. </p><p></p><p>The top 20, Nebraska and above, would be ranked higher anyways so it's not really that big a deal. But consider ones like Minnesota who is currently 24th adds half the points that we do. Same with Mizzou who is currently at 27th. Both of them are also adding high rated transfers that are likely to make a big impact. So likely any team below Utah adding 1 or 2 would almost certainly be passed as would cal and iowa above them. Iowa adds no transfer to note and I did it for Cal myself. I also checked MSU and they would be at about 210. </p><p></p><p>So that would put us at 33 behind NCSU based on the current rankings, but also passing Cal and Iowa puts us at 31. I also checked PSU just to see but they end up at 218 so slightly ahead. That ends us at 31. And that's without making any distinction between grad transfers and ones that function more like traditional recruits. Doing so would likely benefit us as most of our higher rated transfers aren't of grad transfer variety. </p><p></p><p>But regardless, at this point any sticking point is about things that aren't likely to make a significant impact in the overall picture. Even a basic attempt to factor in the transfers leads to pretty much the same conclusion. A fringe top 30 class that is at the top of the second tier in conference standings, slightly worse than last year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 774395, member: 2299"] 29th was compared to last year's results which were a more standard year and so the impact of transfers across the board was likely much lower. Its by no means a perfect comparison but it's a good rough estimate. As far as your sticking point goes, when you asked for it before, I did exactly that for every ACC team and you then proceeded to ignore it anyways. FWIW here are the transfers and transfers above .85 for those ranked ahead of us nationally. I'm not going bother with ACC teams since I already did them. These are according to 247 so there could be those missing as pointed out before. Bama - 0 OSU - 0 UGA - 0 LSU - 0 Oregon - 0 TAMU - 0 USC - 2 (2) ND - 1 (1) OU - 0 UF - 3 (2) Mich - 1 (1) Tenn - 1 (1) Wisc - 0 Texas - 2 (0) Maryland - 1 (1) Miss - 1 (0) Nebraska - 4 (2) Ark - 2 (2) PSU - 4 (2) Minn - 5 (2) Iowa - 1 (0) Cal - 1 (1) Mizz - 2 (2) Utah - 4 (4) Washington - 1 (1) Miss St - 5 (1) OkieSt - 4 (0) WVU - 1 (1) Kentucky - 1 (1) MSU - 5 (3) Rutgers - 4 (1) Baylor - 3 (2) Cinci - 2 (1) Kansas - 1 (0) Compared to GT - 7 (5) or 8(6) with Cochran although he isn't listed on 247. The top 20, Nebraska and above, would be ranked higher anyways so it's not really that big a deal. But consider ones like Minnesota who is currently 24th adds half the points that we do. Same with Mizzou who is currently at 27th. Both of them are also adding high rated transfers that are likely to make a big impact. So likely any team below Utah adding 1 or 2 would almost certainly be passed as would cal and iowa above them. Iowa adds no transfer to note and I did it for Cal myself. I also checked MSU and they would be at about 210. So that would put us at 33 behind NCSU based on the current rankings, but also passing Cal and Iowa puts us at 31. I also checked PSU just to see but they end up at 218 so slightly ahead. That ends us at 31. And that's without making any distinction between grad transfers and ones that function more like traditional recruits. Doing so would likely benefit us as most of our higher rated transfers aren't of grad transfer variety. But regardless, at this point any sticking point is about things that aren't likely to make a significant impact in the overall picture. Even a basic attempt to factor in the transfers leads to pretty much the same conclusion. A fringe top 30 class that is at the top of the second tier in conference standings, slightly worse than last year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 Recruiting Class & Transfers In
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top