Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 G1 NIU ATL Depth Chart
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 819080" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>Seals had 12TDs to 10INTs compared to Sims’ 13 & 13. Seals has also accounted for -52 (yes, that’s negative 52) rushing yards on the year, compared to Sims’ 492.</p><p></p><p>Seals completed 186 of 288 passes for 1928 yards. Sims completed 141 of 257 passes for 1881 yards. That means Seals completed 45 more passes than Sims but only gained 47 more yards through the air. When you compare that to Sims’ rushing advantage on Seals, Sims still accounted for 445 more yards than Seals last year, and 7 more touchdowns.</p><p></p><p>Completion percentage is about like batting average. Sure it paints a decent picture about how good a QB is, but it doesn’t come close to telling the full story. Completion percentage is no where close to being the end-all-be-all stat for QBs. 55% isn’t a great completion rate, but it’s far from bad. Given Sims’ dual-threat ability if he gets to 60% this year it will likely be more than enough to keep defenses honest.</p><p></p><p>Just for the record, Lamar Jackson never had a season with a 60% completion rate. And his freshman year he went 135-247 for 1840 yards (55%) with 12 TDS and 8 INTs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 819080, member: 4572"] Seals had 12TDs to 10INTs compared to Sims’ 13 & 13. Seals has also accounted for -52 (yes, that’s negative 52) rushing yards on the year, compared to Sims’ 492. Seals completed 186 of 288 passes for 1928 yards. Sims completed 141 of 257 passes for 1881 yards. That means Seals completed 45 more passes than Sims but only gained 47 more yards through the air. When you compare that to Sims’ rushing advantage on Seals, Sims still accounted for 445 more yards than Seals last year, and 7 more touchdowns. Completion percentage is about like batting average. Sure it paints a decent picture about how good a QB is, but it doesn’t come close to telling the full story. Completion percentage is no where close to being the end-all-be-all stat for QBs. 55% isn’t a great completion rate, but it’s far from bad. Given Sims’ dual-threat ability if he gets to 60% this year it will likely be more than enough to keep defenses honest. Just for the record, Lamar Jackson never had a season with a 60% completion rate. And his freshman year he went 135-247 for 1840 yards (55%) with 12 TDS and 8 INTs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2021 G1 NIU ATL Depth Chart
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top