Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2020 Offseason Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 728051" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>Navy vs. Notre Dame 2019:</p><p>64-281 yards on the ground</p><p>4-13 79 yards 1 TD through the air</p><p></p><p>Georgia Tech vs. Georgia 2018</p><p>46-128 yards </p><p>5-14 91 yards 1 TD through the air</p><p></p><p>Georgia Tech vs. Clemson 2018</p><p>56-146 yards </p><p>3-8 57 yards 1 TD through the air</p><p></p><p>Army vs. Michigan 2019</p><p>61-200yards</p><p>2-5 43 yards through the air </p><p></p><p>Navy had multiple games last year where they threw for 150+ yards. Obviously they are running the same basic scheme that CPJ did, but there are definitely more modern concepts built in. Like I said, their shotgun read options look way more like Alabama or any other “pro style spread” team than what Tech’s did. As you mentioned, it gives the QB more time to make the read, and with a QB who can throw, you can add an RPO concept to the original RO play call. The same concepts out of different formations still require the defense to make adjustments. Didn’t a lot of you guys criticize CDP this year for <em>not </em>calling more running plays from under center? Why? Because it creates different looks, and allows the back to receive the ball with more momentum. Taking snaps out of the shotgun allows you more space and time to make reads, and is ideal in the passing game. You’re telling me nothing would have changed if Tech would’ve ran the same concepts that CPJ stuck to out of the shotgun? Like I said earlier, if you QB has any sort of arm talent it creates so much more chaos on the defensive side of the ball. Lamar Jackson and the Ravens are the perfect example of that. They can run the trap option out of the shotgun, and out of the same formation they could run any sort of flood or levels passing concepts.</p><p></p><p>I think we’re arguing about different points entirely. You seem more focused on just the passing side of it, while I’m trying to explain how spreading the offense back out could allow for the same concepts to be ran out of multiple looks, <em>with </em>the added benefit of a better passing game. Not necessarily that the passing game would be used more often, just that it would probably become more effective.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 728051, member: 4572"] Navy vs. Notre Dame 2019: 64-281 yards on the ground 4-13 79 yards 1 TD through the air Georgia Tech vs. Georgia 2018 46-128 yards 5-14 91 yards 1 TD through the air Georgia Tech vs. Clemson 2018 56-146 yards 3-8 57 yards 1 TD through the air Army vs. Michigan 2019 61-200yards 2-5 43 yards through the air Navy had multiple games last year where they threw for 150+ yards. Obviously they are running the same basic scheme that CPJ did, but there are definitely more modern concepts built in. Like I said, their shotgun read options look way more like Alabama or any other “pro style spread” team than what Tech’s did. As you mentioned, it gives the QB more time to make the read, and with a QB who can throw, you can add an RPO concept to the original RO play call. The same concepts out of different formations still require the defense to make adjustments. Didn’t a lot of you guys criticize CDP this year for [I]not [/I]calling more running plays from under center? Why? Because it creates different looks, and allows the back to receive the ball with more momentum. Taking snaps out of the shotgun allows you more space and time to make reads, and is ideal in the passing game. You’re telling me nothing would have changed if Tech would’ve ran the same concepts that CPJ stuck to out of the shotgun? Like I said earlier, if you QB has any sort of arm talent it creates so much more chaos on the defensive side of the ball. Lamar Jackson and the Ravens are the perfect example of that. They can run the trap option out of the shotgun, and out of the same formation they could run any sort of flood or levels passing concepts. I think we’re arguing about different points entirely. You seem more focused on just the passing side of it, while I’m trying to explain how spreading the offense back out could allow for the same concepts to be ran out of multiple looks, [I]with [/I]the added benefit of a better passing game. Not necessarily that the passing game would be used more often, just that it would probably become more effective. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
2020 Offseason Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top