Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 2897" data-source="post: 416895"><p>But that's just it - suggestions from these same scientists that advocate for doing something predict a reduction in temperature of about 0.2 degrees (if every single country adhered absolutely strictly to the Paris Agreement). When all your temperature measurements and science behind it are imprecise and corrupted enough that 0.2 is lost in rounding error, then what really is the point?</p><p>Source of the 0.2: <a href="https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2015%20Energy%20%26%20Climate%20Outlook.pdf" target="_blank">https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2015 Energy & Climate Outlook.pdf</a></p><p>Exact quote from MIT in that article: <em>"Assuming the proposed cuts under the Paris Agreement are extended through 2100 but not deepened further, they result in about 0.2°C less warming by the end of the century."</em></p><p></p><p>I don't see the point. I mean I see the point from the other side - more taxes and government control and they strengthen their relationship to their global warming religion. But I don't see the point from a practical point of view.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 2897, post: 416895"] But that's just it - suggestions from these same scientists that advocate for doing something predict a reduction in temperature of about 0.2 degrees (if every single country adhered absolutely strictly to the Paris Agreement). When all your temperature measurements and science behind it are imprecise and corrupted enough that 0.2 is lost in rounding error, then what really is the point? Source of the 0.2: [URL]https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2015%20Energy%20%26%20Climate%20Outlook.pdf[/URL] Exact quote from MIT in that article: [I]"Assuming the proposed cuts under the Paris Agreement are extended through 2100 but not deepened further, they result in about 0.2°C less warming by the end of the century."[/I] I don't see the point. I mean I see the point from the other side - more taxes and government control and they strengthen their relationship to their global warming religion. But I don't see the point from a practical point of view. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top