Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 217571" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Very disappointing. I don't know why, but I had still held out hope for greater maturity than this response demonstrates. </p><p></p><p>I have given, on several occasions, a concrete definition of how I use Liberal Fundamentalist. It does not apply to everyone with whom I disagree but only to those who operate dogmatically from a faith position and an unwillingness to discuss reasons for their position beyond citing authorities that they accept on faith. </p><p></p><p>I also didn't introduce the language of conspiracy. You did in order to dismiss me with a broad brush as a 9/11 truther or denier of the Warren Commission results. I did accept the language of conspiracy in the sense that the e-mails gave evidence of conspiring to hide data inconsistent with the theory. There is no hyperbole there.</p><p></p><p>I used the term alarmist as a handy term which I considered neutral. I really don't think those warning that humans are making a dangerous contribution to climate change would be bothered by being characterized as raising an alarm. That's also pretty literal.</p><p></p><p>smh. Very disappointing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 217571, member: 195"] Very disappointing. I don't know why, but I had still held out hope for greater maturity than this response demonstrates. I have given, on several occasions, a concrete definition of how I use Liberal Fundamentalist. It does not apply to everyone with whom I disagree but only to those who operate dogmatically from a faith position and an unwillingness to discuss reasons for their position beyond citing authorities that they accept on faith. I also didn't introduce the language of conspiracy. You did in order to dismiss me with a broad brush as a 9/11 truther or denier of the Warren Commission results. I did accept the language of conspiracy in the sense that the e-mails gave evidence of conspiring to hide data inconsistent with the theory. There is no hyperbole there. I used the term alarmist as a handy term which I considered neutral. I really don't think those warning that humans are making a dangerous contribution to climate change would be bothered by being characterized as raising an alarm. That's also pretty literal. smh. Very disappointing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top