Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Northeast Stinger" data-source="post: 217413" data-attributes="member: 1640"><p>That's not my conclusion, but good going with the straw man argument. My conclusion is that if a conspiracy by necessity involves thousands of people, public, private, non-profit and government agencies and world wide connections to keep it a secret, it should not be difficult to find and prove. If it is difficult to prove, and remains elusive for an extended period of time, then someone is straining at gnats to swallow camels to connect dots that don't exist. </p><p></p><p>I hold a dim view of people who hack computers in order to mount smear campaigns. I suspect I would probably want to keep any further violations of private emails from becoming more fuel for conspiracy theories. Especially if it was going to damage further important research. But that is just me.</p><p></p><p>I guess 8 different investigations into "climategate" that found no conspiracy were also all part of the conspiracy. Gee, that is the problem with conspiracies once they get started, huh. </p><p></p><p>Yes, I followed the conversation with [USER=323]@cyptomcat[/USER]. I honestly thought that the conversation would have cured you from thinking that everyone who accepts global warming is a fear monger and out to take over the world. Guess I was wrong. </p><p></p><p>I listed over a dozen organizations that accept global warming and, who, in many cases, think the climatgate email thing is a manufactured scandal. All I was curious about was which of those organizations do you generally trust. You can say that trust is not a scientific principle, and you would be right. But whenever someone comes on this thread and gives a link to a source that agrees with your position you seem to have no qualms about letting it ride. I do not believe I have ever seen you call into question the web sites or organizations that others have shared on this thread because they did not discuss data "in the proper way." Discussing date "in the proper way" seems to only be reserved for people who disagree with you. That is just my observation.</p><p></p><p>So which of those groups or organizations that I listed do you trust? Or, if you prefer to put it another way, which ones are involved in the conspiracy?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Northeast Stinger, post: 217413, member: 1640"] That's not my conclusion, but good going with the straw man argument. My conclusion is that if a conspiracy by necessity involves thousands of people, public, private, non-profit and government agencies and world wide connections to keep it a secret, it should not be difficult to find and prove. If it is difficult to prove, and remains elusive for an extended period of time, then someone is straining at gnats to swallow camels to connect dots that don't exist. I hold a dim view of people who hack computers in order to mount smear campaigns. I suspect I would probably want to keep any further violations of private emails from becoming more fuel for conspiracy theories. Especially if it was going to damage further important research. But that is just me. I guess 8 different investigations into "climategate" that found no conspiracy were also all part of the conspiracy. Gee, that is the problem with conspiracies once they get started, huh. Yes, I followed the conversation with [USER=323]@cyptomcat[/USER]. I honestly thought that the conversation would have cured you from thinking that everyone who accepts global warming is a fear monger and out to take over the world. Guess I was wrong. I listed over a dozen organizations that accept global warming and, who, in many cases, think the climatgate email thing is a manufactured scandal. All I was curious about was which of those organizations do you generally trust. You can say that trust is not a scientific principle, and you would be right. But whenever someone comes on this thread and gives a link to a source that agrees with your position you seem to have no qualms about letting it ride. I do not believe I have ever seen you call into question the web sites or organizations that others have shared on this thread because they did not discuss data "in the proper way." Discussing date "in the proper way" seems to only be reserved for people who disagree with you. That is just my observation. So which of those groups or organizations that I listed do you trust? Or, if you prefer to put it another way, which ones are involved in the conspiracy? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
The Swarm Lounge
2015 Warmest Year on Record
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top