Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
12/15 Early Signing Day: GT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 855158" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>Key said it was easier to recruit to Tech because he had quote, “more to sell.” No where did he say he was going to starting bringing in top 100 recruits on the regular. I think Key believed he was going to have an easier time bringing in 4 stars when he said that, but I certainly don’t think he meant he would be bringing in the same caliber of athlete to Tech that he was at Bama. Just that he would be signing more of the recruits he was in on and who were we competing with similar schools against. At Bama he was competing with UGA, Clemson, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and the like. At Tech he’s competing with UNC, Virginia, South Carolina, Auburn, VT, etc. </p><p></p><p>I really have no idea how anybody can look at CGC’s, Key’s, or Stansbury’s comments on the new regimes recruiting capabilities and think any of them meant or thought we’d be competing with Bama and UGA for top 100 recruits and 5 stars.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 855158, member: 4572"] Key said it was easier to recruit to Tech because he had quote, “more to sell.” No where did he say he was going to starting bringing in top 100 recruits on the regular. I think Key believed he was going to have an easier time bringing in 4 stars when he said that, but I certainly don’t think he meant he would be bringing in the same caliber of athlete to Tech that he was at Bama. Just that he would be signing more of the recruits he was in on and who were we competing with similar schools against. At Bama he was competing with UGA, Clemson, Oklahoma, Ohio State, Notre Dame, and the like. At Tech he’s competing with UNC, Virginia, South Carolina, Auburn, VT, etc. I really have no idea how anybody can look at CGC’s, Key’s, or Stansbury’s comments on the new regimes recruiting capabilities and think any of them meant or thought we’d be competing with Bama and UGA for top 100 recruits and 5 stars. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
12/15 Early Signing Day: GT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top