Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
115 Years of GT Football – A New Chapter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceeater1969" data-source="post: 606649" data-attributes="member: 1237"><p>When i ssw the first series against nd, i knew the first 2ctea</p><p></p><p>At the hotel (after the tulane game ) and just before the ND 15 game, i asked a coach if we could expect to see gt scoring game continue. He said we are about to play grown men and tulane didnt do us any favors by laying down (we score 21 in 4th- tulane - twice tulane had 9 men on field). </p><p>Back to graph</p><p></p><p>Navy, could the power factor Imo, t gives too much credit to our big victories against lessor teams who have no resources to play against our scheme w a genius calling the plays.</p><p></p><p> In 15 the first 2 games we were close to 80 points in the first half. We scored 17 point/ quarter for those 8 quarters and from then on we scored about 6 points per quarter. </p><p></p><p>I am wondering if the power model gives too much reward reward for big victories over really bad teams.</p><p></p><p>I am concerned this high level look could be giving us a higher than actual rating in 15 and 18 ( in 18 usf, bg, Louisville and even vt for some reason stayed in a bad alignment that allowed qb or bb end run w zone blocking) when w slaugthered teams. How is this handled in model? </p><p></p><p>Your data shows that gt under cpj was """ NOT """improved over Gailey who was fired. </p><p></p><p>Imo, Gt was and is wanting an upward trend from Gailey . Matching Gailey is not acceptable. The cpj years ( during which cpj s genius allowed us to underfund football and burned him out) has no upward trend. </p><p></p><p> If model is biased up for big victories, we could be slightly down under cpj which would mean it may take a while to show an upward trend. </p><p>I am hopeful we can show real progress over next 4 years. </p><p>I like the model andchope u will keep it going .</p><p></p><p>Ps - here is picture of alcorn recruiter's car at Pensacola high looking to see the head coach. He was out to start meeting the coaches as alcorn has decided to recruit a larger area. </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]6283[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceeater1969, post: 606649, member: 1237"] When i ssw the first series against nd, i knew the first 2ctea At the hotel (after the tulane game ) and just before the ND 15 game, i asked a coach if we could expect to see gt scoring game continue. He said we are about to play grown men and tulane didnt do us any favors by laying down (we score 21 in 4th- tulane - twice tulane had 9 men on field). Back to graph Navy, could the power factor Imo, t gives too much credit to our big victories against lessor teams who have no resources to play against our scheme w a genius calling the plays. In 15 the first 2 games we were close to 80 points in the first half. We scored 17 point/ quarter for those 8 quarters and from then on we scored about 6 points per quarter. I am wondering if the power model gives too much reward reward for big victories over really bad teams. I am concerned this high level look could be giving us a higher than actual rating in 15 and 18 ( in 18 usf, bg, Louisville and even vt for some reason stayed in a bad alignment that allowed qb or bb end run w zone blocking) when w slaugthered teams. How is this handled in model? Your data shows that gt under cpj was """ NOT """improved over Gailey who was fired. Imo, Gt was and is wanting an upward trend from Gailey . Matching Gailey is not acceptable. The cpj years ( during which cpj s genius allowed us to underfund football and burned him out) has no upward trend. If model is biased up for big victories, we could be slightly down under cpj which would mean it may take a while to show an upward trend. I am hopeful we can show real progress over next 4 years. I like the model andchope u will keep it going . Ps - here is picture of alcorn recruiter's car at Pensacola high looking to see the head coach. He was out to start meeting the coaches as alcorn has decided to recruit a larger area. [ATTACH=full]6283[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
115 Years of GT Football – A New Chapter
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top