Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
112 Years of GT Football - How Bad Were We Last Year?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iceeater1969" data-source="post: 203087" data-attributes="member: 1237"><p>The graph makes the Carson drop off look better than it was. </p><p></p><p>In 65 and 66 gt was good and very good against 10 team schedule w no easy games. The so called easy games were duke, tcu, Texas a m , Clemson.</p><p></p><p>In 67,68,69 we dropped in talent but had even tougher schedule and went 4-6 all three years. The coaching was not that bad but that time was deemed so terrible - an article by Furman Bisher had a tag line - Ramlin wreck is ga tech and a helluva shape its in. The 47-8 loss to UGA in Athens was torture</p><p></p><p></p><p>With the new 13 game schedule (everybody with a pulse goes to a bowl) the old 4-6 record would ratio to 5.2-7.8. Imo - 1 game is a scheduled win ( I have great mercer seats to trade for any clemson seats) . That makes a current 6-7 record equal to the three Carson terrible years.</p><p></p><p>Now 6-7 is the new terrible.</p><p></p><p>Last year gt was close in most games but only won 1 game besides the 2 easy teams. </p><p>We were approx 3 wins shy of terrible. </p><p></p><p>With a little better execution we could have easily have roared past terrible and made it to the new definition of not so bad = 7-5. I will be disappointed if we don't bounce back 7-5 ( beat 2 easy teams and split with rest). A bowl game loss doesn't matter to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iceeater1969, post: 203087, member: 1237"] The graph makes the Carson drop off look better than it was. In 65 and 66 gt was good and very good against 10 team schedule w no easy games. The so called easy games were duke, tcu, Texas a m , Clemson. In 67,68,69 we dropped in talent but had even tougher schedule and went 4-6 all three years. The coaching was not that bad but that time was deemed so terrible - an article by Furman Bisher had a tag line - Ramlin wreck is ga tech and a helluva shape its in. The 47-8 loss to UGA in Athens was torture With the new 13 game schedule (everybody with a pulse goes to a bowl) the old 4-6 record would ratio to 5.2-7.8. Imo - 1 game is a scheduled win ( I have great mercer seats to trade for any clemson seats) . That makes a current 6-7 record equal to the three Carson terrible years. Now 6-7 is the new terrible. Last year gt was close in most games but only won 1 game besides the 2 easy teams. We were approx 3 wins shy of terrible. With a little better execution we could have easily have roared past terrible and made it to the new definition of not so bad = 7-5. I will be disappointed if we don't bounce back 7-5 ( beat 2 easy teams and split with rest). A bowl game loss doesn't matter to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
112 Years of GT Football - How Bad Were We Last Year?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top