Search results

That's my whole point. So why waste stress & energy over what we can't control? Just relax.

How does you or I "expressing concern" change the situation one iota? Hint - it doesn't. Therefore, I choose not to waste any of my anxiety on it. Each to his own.

Oh I get it lol. I used to be the same way. Get help while you still can. 🙂

Correct Vespidae. The Ivies were using paid ringers in the 1870s or so as soon as they learned people would pay money to watch this new sport.

No need to waste anxiety on the portal between seasons. When early August arrives, familiarize yourself with the roster. These will be our guys for 2024. Then, it's simply Go Jackets! No stress.

This is the correct take. Sims was massively misled & misused by TFG.

I have to agree. I've been to a lot of Duke games here & I don't remember any of them being close to a sellout.

Awesome lol. And just as facts-based as the Dude Lambert & Mhiver3. 😄

What team are you a fan of? "WreckinGT" sounds like you want to see Tech wrecked, and all your posts are heavily slanted toward FSU & seemingly cheering for the demise of the ACC?

In the Big Realigment Rumor Debacle of the early 2010s, he admitted making up stuff to hopefully help kill off the ACC. Ditto MHiver3. Yet, a handful of unbelievably naive people still pay attention to what these 2 confirmed & admitted liars have to say. It's mind boggling to me. [and yes...

It seems some do not... why then would they want to discuss odds between middling teams? 🙂

Again, "average" teams do nothing to move the national needle. Perception is based on the top teams. Perception translates to eyeballs on tv, which translates to $$$. Games between middling teams (in any conference) do not matter when it comes to the $$.

Tbh I think when it comes to this issue you let outside voices color your perception of reality. I - and others - have presented plenty of data showing the ACC has been less good at football than the SEC since the get-go, but you cling to the Recent Great SEC-ESPN Conspiracy Theory. But hey...

That's the point. The rest of the CFB world simply does not care about the middle & bottom of the conferences. You are arguing about something that does not matter. You asked my criteria for a "clear gap" between the SEC & ACC, and when I provided it you ignored it. I am 100% not surprised

Tech people love data. Unless the data doesn't support their position. 🙂 Why didn't you ask the same question about the ACC? 71% of their titles are by 2 teams. Also - as you for some reason ignore - all that mattes to the natonal perspective are the top teams. And the national perspective...

There are many. Here's one: Nattys since the ACC began: SEC 26 ACC 7 You could also look at Top 10 finishes in the final rankings since the ACC's birth. I anticipate that gap would be quite larger than this, which is 3.7 times more for the SEC.

There has been a "clear gap" between ACC football and SEC football since the ACC was formed in 1953. Yes, we can cherry pick 6-7 seasons out of the last 71 where the ACC was better. The point is, this is nothing new. What's dumbfounding is that there are people on this board who refuse to...

How? I might think, say, Virginia would be a great add to the B1G. It means absolutely nothing because I have zero say, no influence and no clue whatsoever what the powers-that-be are actually thinking. Which is the case for all these folks throwing their opinions out for clicks.

Pure speculation, nothing more. You or I could post our opinions about the subject here and that would have the same relevance.

The 6 you mentioned, plus Texas & Okla. That's 8 in the SEC. Tbh, including Tech, UNC & VPI is a stretch. VPI nor UNC have ever won a natty & we haven't been relevant for a decade. So 3 in the ACC.