Search results

This was absolutely worth saying 3 times. THWG

Really glad to hear that!

I'm too slow, Dammit! :)

And if he's anything like me while he watches our games, the name will also remind him of Georgia Tech football.

Since we are literally re-Coopering, i would say that is exactly the right word.

It was mentioned in another thread already, but we didn't have to test our kick coverage because Shawn Davis kicked the **** out of the ball. And he executed a pretty nice onside kick.

You're making it too difficult. If we win 7 or 8 games and you like Paul Johnson, then we had a strong SOS, if you don't like Paul Johnson then it was a weak SOS. Simple really.

This. It's both infuriating and somewhat promising. If we can get out of our own way, we can be a pretty good team. Hopefully this game will help us get over the hump for the last 3 games.

I couldn't hear him over my own string of profanities...

But I like it better when it's them :sneaky:

Props to Marshall too for coming back from the pick with a pretty nice throw to Jeune for the TD.

Proud of these kids. We've got plenty to work on, but they don't quit.

And since we've blown two of that type of game, we're due for two upsets. Works out just right.

I blame the Wahoo who is trying to distract us with his unnatural point totals...

well i guess that answers that question. i'd complain that my memory sucks, but that was probably why i was originally thinking 2pts. since there is a change of possession, its a touchdown on the try vs. a safety, therefore 2 points.

you know, i debated that before posting it, but didn't bother to look it up. sure enough, a safety on a try after attempt is only worth 1 point. strangely enough it happened not long ago, though not in the direction i was envisioning. i wonder if one has ever been returned by the defense...

the 4 made me laugh out loud. two safeties, two blocked extra points returned for TDs or one of each?;)

yeah, i wasn't really talking about our "motion into the wishbone" formation that we run on 4th down. (and sometimes to great effect on 3rd down :)). more just during the regular flow of the game.

a little hyperbole never hurt anybody. ;) i don't think its a new issue. i recall we made some adjustments a few years back when defenses seemed to key on the count by timing the aback motion. we added some hard counts, even resetting the a back in the middle of the arc motion. i'm just...

the primary reason i'd be interested in seeing us go no-huddle occasionally is to give us more time to change the snap count, particularly on when we're playing on the road. as it stands, we run the play into the huddle, get lined up then check the play at the line, and there seems to always be...