alagold
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 3,732
- Location
- Huntsville,Al
At this point I could be happy enough with Key or Chadwell.Anyone else I would have to examine closely.
Some problem with the question set is the first 1-3 are almost inevitabilities by replacing xcgc, 4 might be directly tied to team success and 5 can be attributed partly to the Institute, see our latest 4*QB commit.The answers to these questions appear to be an unequivocal "Yes".
- Has practice intensity been dialed up?
- Does the team look better prepared come game time?
- Are better sideline decisions being made?
- Are the players saying good things about and staying loyal to their coach?
- Are we still picking up quality recruits despite the uncertainties?
Key may not get the job, but if he doesn't, I don't think that the three losses will be the reason. Citing them against BK's candidacy for HC is not a valid argument.
That is quite true...right up until the first rough patch. Then the knives will start to come back out.A lot of posters have commented that they would be satisfied with more than one of the choices. So perhaps we won't be as divided a fanbase as we sometimes are.
A lot of folks have questioned whether IHCBK is the right man for the job because of ugly losses to UVA, FSU and Miami. To me, the UVA game is the real head scratcher.
But at the same time, it seems reasonable to ask how #21 Pitt fans felt about losing to Tech in BK's first game as HC. Or how #15 UNC fans felt about dropping a game to us at home last week. Tennessee beats Alabama and gets blown out by SC? Games like these happen.
So, given where the Tech FB program is at present, I'm not sure that our W-L record is the best overall indicator of BK's potential as a HC. Instead, I would look to see whether the team has turned a corner, gotten back on track, and begun making incremental improvements that add up over time.
The answers to these questions appear to be an unequivocal "Yes".
- Has practice intensity been dialed up?
- Does the team look better prepared come game time?
- Are better sideline decisions being made?
- Are the players saying good things about and staying loyal to their coach?
- Are we still picking up quality recruits despite the uncertainties?
Key may not get the job, but if he doesn't, I don't think that the three losses will be the reason. Citing them against BK's candidacy for HC is not a valid argument.
Yes.Is it assumed a decision will come next week?
I think most will give him yearsThat is quite true...right up until the first rough patch. Then the knives will start to come back out.
At this point I could be happy enough with Key or Chadwell.
So, what am I missing? What's the big turn-off about BOB?
For me it is his offensive performance this year (for starters). He took a team with ah Heisman Trophy QB which had the 2nd best offensive rating in the country, which added Jamyr Gibbs, and turned it into the 17th ranked offensive unit in the country. His college success was at locations that had TONS of resources and despite the scholarship restrictions at Penn State, that program is the bellwether of a huge state. He was able to recruit a 5 star QB who decided that getting in early was worth it since the restrictions were only 2 years. Can that be replicated at GT? I doubt it.I've been focused on Chadwell and Key comments and arguments and haven't paid much attention to the arguments for BOB. He hasn't gotten a lot of votes in the poll, and more than one poster has basically said, "Hell, no."
But given some of the latest chatter (allegedly coming out of Alabama country), I took a look at his resume. Not too shabby.
So, what am I missing? What's the big turn-off about BOB?
Option? What option? It's a heresy of football! Nobody's running any option plays on my field.I think we will be okay with any one of these three opti ...er... candidates.
A lot of folks have questioned whether IHCBK is the right man for the job because of ugly losses to UVA, FSU and Miami. To me, the UVA game is the real head scratcher.
But at the same time, it seems reasonable to ask how #21 Pitt fans felt about losing to Tech in BK's first game as HC. Or how #15 UNC fans felt about dropping a game to us at home last week. Tennessee beats Alabama and gets blown out by SC? Games like these happen.
So, given where the Tech FB program is at present, I'm not sure that our W-L record is the best overall indicator of BK's potential as a HC. Instead, I would look to see whether the team has turned a corner, gotten back on track, and begun making incremental improvements that add up over time.
The answers to these questions appear to be an unequivocal "Yes".
- Has practice intensity been dialed up?
- Does the team look better prepared come game time?
- Are better sideline decisions being made?
- Are the players saying good things about and staying loyal to their coach?
- Are we still picking up quality recruits despite the uncertainties?
Key may not get the job, but if he doesn't, I don't think that the three losses will be the reason. Citing them against BK's candidacy for HC is not a valid argument.