MikeJackets1967
Helluva Engineer
- Messages
- 14,844
- Location
- Lovely Ducktown,Tennessee
FIFYThey are called TE. Welcome to the 1970s-1980s lol.
FIFYThey are called TE. Welcome to the 1970s-1980s lol.
Camp is just too slow to be productive. He can’t separate at all. I’m sure he could win in a possession situation and not real sure but he’s probably a good blocker.Malachi Carter showed some promise this year. Camp disappointed me a little bit. I was(and am) really excited to see Hawkins-Anderson, but maybe he isn't ready. It would be an awesome speed/size combo with Dolphus. Sanders also got some hype.
Especially when we have one of them cover the fastest receiver on the other team.We desperately need more speed at the Linebacker positions, so I am willing to listen to all potential moves with faster players.
The ol coaches need to be a lot younger and better at teaching.Lol. Well you and I are in 100% agreement, you were justtttt a bit more direct This is why if we switch OL coaches, its pointless unless we go outside of the PJ and service academy tree. We need some new perspective with this position group. Changing messengers without changing technique is a waste of time and energy. I know this is a WR thread, but it all flows together in the passing game
Especially when we have one of them cover the fastest receiver on the other team.
Isn't there someone upstairs in the box tasked with watching for that stuff also?Could not have been a worse call for cover 2 shell or tampa2. Uga saw this as a tape tendancy on early downs and purposely put their fastest player at #3 forcing the mlb to take him; which is his responsibility on seam plays. Unfortunately that D is meant for when 3 is a TE not in 4 wr sets vs our base D.
Lets just say woody shoulda taken a TO or there had to be a check to get out of that and bring the other S over and move into man. You cant ask any mlb to do that. Totally schooled
If paul had been a hc not an oc at that point coaching his O (iirc that is what he said he was doing) its on him to take the to.
That's Juan Tay, sir. He is a playmaker, though.Just after Juanjey took it back the idea of putting him at wide receiver jumped into my head. Some of y'all have good arguments against that, though. He is a playmaker and we need a playmaker at wide receiver desperately.
Isn't there someone upstairs in the box tasked with watching for that stuff also?
Especially when we have one of them cover the fastest receiver on the other team.
Trying to stay on topic:
2019 WR situation:
Camp: I can see JC being the reliable Brad Stewart role (great blocking, sure hands)
Carter: Glimpses of playmaking ability, more speed (enough, tho?)
Hawkins-Anderson, Sanders, Dolphus, Jackson, Harris: can one of these bring the playmaking ability (i.e. speed to burn) we need here?
Jaylon Jackson is intriguing (has size of an AB but listed at WR. Remember Anthony Autry (not Myles)? Looked dynamic before leaving).
I'm interested to see Hawkins-Anderson, as well.
If LJ wins the spring QB battle, I wonder if we might see some trips sets with a real WR in the slot rather than an AB?
Fun convo to have (minus the constant negativity)
Funny how the last few years we raved about the potential this offense had with Camp because of how much more athletically gifted he was compared to Jeune and Stewart and now he’s too slow and we’re raving about the athleticism of these younger receivers now.
I think we should use bigger ABs now. I'd love to see some Darren Waller type ABs.I was actually having that conversation with someone today. If we get any more cut blocking rule changes we will have to use bigger ABs.
Our WRs actually get decent separation, the problem is two fold:
1. Our OL doesn't give our QB time to let the WRs progress in their routes for separation.
2. Our QBs are not very good with anticipation throws, and don't have the accuracy to fit the ball in the windows the defense gives us.
For people who say we should pass more, that's just suicide for our offense. IMO, they're just wasted possessions because of personnel issues, and our schemes are too formulaic and outdated. We just don't game plan match ups and game plan our passing schemes to take advantage of mismatches. Read this, and see how much Ohio State game planned to obliterate Michigan's vaunted defense:
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio...t-game-plan-to-attack-the-top-ranked-michigan
Absolutely beautiful stuff. How many times are we confusing defenses out of our "tight" formation, or motioning into trips expose LBs? We actually have mesh concepts in our playbook, but I can't remember a time we've advanced our staple mesh play.
IMO, our best matchups will always be the ABs vs the LBs and safeties. We need to attack those matchups more often.
Taking someone that has the potential to be our best defensive player and putting him on our offense seems like a really bad idea. In *any* offense, a safety will have more impact on a game than a single WR.