Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNC in the Newspapers again....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forensicbuzz" data-source="post: 42616" data-attributes="member: 198"><p>As an expert in my field of practice, I find the title of that article misleading. The three experts quoted never said there were flaws in the findings. What they said was that the data <u>may</u> have been misinterpreted. They also stated that one of the evaluation criteria was not the best way to evaluate literacy. </p><p></p><p>This type of analysis is used all the time in legal arenas to discredit the work of an opposing expert. These three experts were provided a final report and asked to opine on the veracity of the findings and the methodology. Essentially, the "experts" hands were tied to the report provided and not given access to the raw data used by the original author. As an expert witness, I would probably respond like the second expert and indicate that I didn't have enough data to offer an opinion.</p><p></p><p>She (original author) may be right, may be wrong, or somewhere in the middle, but these three experts and this rebuttal article are merely a ploy by UNC to muddy the water and impugn the findings of the original author. It's about perception not truth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forensicbuzz, post: 42616, member: 198"] As an expert in my field of practice, I find the title of that article misleading. The three experts quoted never said there were flaws in the findings. What they said was that the data [U]may[/U] have been misinterpreted. They also stated that one of the evaluation criteria was not the best way to evaluate literacy. This type of analysis is used all the time in legal arenas to discredit the work of an opposing expert. These three experts were provided a final report and asked to opine on the veracity of the findings and the methodology. Essentially, the "experts" hands were tied to the report provided and not given access to the raw data used by the original author. As an expert witness, I would probably respond like the second expert and indicate that I didn't have enough data to offer an opinion. She (original author) may be right, may be wrong, or somewhere in the middle, but these three experts and this rebuttal article are merely a ploy by UNC to muddy the water and impugn the findings of the original author. It's about perception not truth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
UNC in the Newspapers again....
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top