Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Today in Analytics...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lotta Booze" data-source="post: 831978" data-attributes="member: 4471"><p>I don't <em>think</em> EPA is influenced by having a short field. It certainly accounts for field position in the calculations but it's more the delta between the EPA before a play happens and then the result so it's more tied to what was achieved on the play. </p><p></p><p>I think Army's success in EPA and mediocrity on YPP is probably that they just don't have a lot of explosive plays which could limit their yards per play but they are successful in moving the ball and not hurting themselves so they are above average on EPA. I'm not going to claim to be an expert but that's my take. </p><p></p><p>If you look at the stats below it shows Army ranked at 126 out of 129 in "Long Scrimmage Plays". </p><p><a href="http://www.cfbstats.com/2021/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category30/sort01.html" target="_blank">http://www.cfbstats.com/2021/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category30/sort01.html</a></p><p></p><p>And take a look at who is no. 1.....our next opponent, UVA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lotta Booze, post: 831978, member: 4471"] I don't [I]think[/I] EPA is influenced by having a short field. It certainly accounts for field position in the calculations but it's more the delta between the EPA before a play happens and then the result so it's more tied to what was achieved on the play. I think Army's success in EPA and mediocrity on YPP is probably that they just don't have a lot of explosive plays which could limit their yards per play but they are successful in moving the ball and not hurting themselves so they are above average on EPA. I'm not going to claim to be an expert but that's my take. If you look at the stats below it shows Army ranked at 126 out of 129 in "Long Scrimmage Plays". [URL]http://www.cfbstats.com/2021/leader/national/team/offense/split01/category30/sort01.html[/URL] And take a look at who is no. 1.....our next opponent, UVA. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Today in Analytics...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top