Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Tight End stuff
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IEEEWreck" data-source="post: 33312" data-attributes="member: 617"><p>I don't think there's evidence of that. We backed off the pistol/gun when we had serious issues at the LOS that opening closer to LOS helped to mitigate. Sticking to a new strategy that is being poorly executed is not innovation, it's stupidity. I think most people who say CPJ is rottweiler stubborn haven't made much effort at evaluating execution.</p><p></p><p>From a strategic perspective, I think at least some of the gun stuff was meant to optimize for Vad's arm. JT may not have quite the same arm, but he's no rust hands either. It makes sense maybe not to run as many big pass focused plays, but JT's skills make using those sets a good idea some of the time. Consider if we had Nesbitt instead. Many of those plays just wouldn't make sense because they would expose weaknesses and remove strengths.</p><p></p><p>We have a long time to fix those LOS issues before next season. I think it'd be safe to say we'll achieve competence with vanilla TO stuff first, then new gun stuff. I don't see anything that would lead me to believe that CPJ finds the gun stuff strategically unsound. I suspect we'll run the hell out of it if and when we can win with it. Whether that's opening game next year is up to what the coaches and players do until then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IEEEWreck, post: 33312, member: 617"] I don't think there's evidence of that. We backed off the pistol/gun when we had serious issues at the LOS that opening closer to LOS helped to mitigate. Sticking to a new strategy that is being poorly executed is not innovation, it's stupidity. I think most people who say CPJ is rottweiler stubborn haven't made much effort at evaluating execution. From a strategic perspective, I think at least some of the gun stuff was meant to optimize for Vad's arm. JT may not have quite the same arm, but he's no rust hands either. It makes sense maybe not to run as many big pass focused plays, but JT's skills make using those sets a good idea some of the time. Consider if we had Nesbitt instead. Many of those plays just wouldn't make sense because they would expose weaknesses and remove strengths. We have a long time to fix those LOS issues before next season. I think it'd be safe to say we'll achieve competence with vanilla TO stuff first, then new gun stuff. I don't see anything that would lead me to believe that CPJ finds the gun stuff strategically unsound. I suspect we'll run the hell out of it if and when we can win with it. Whether that's opening game next year is up to what the coaches and players do until then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Tight End stuff
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top