Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Linch Pin of Winning
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rodney Kent" data-source="post: 26702" data-attributes="member: 923"><p>I fully believe a team is a mirror image of a coach regardless of the caliber of players he assembles. I believe the coach is the most important ingredient in the process of winning. However, it is true that once a coach has established his credibility as a winner, he naturally attracts better athletes to his program. For this reason, I am going to offer statistics for my view. I will use many coaches and many teams, but will start with a post I made on another board years ago about the same debate.</p><p> </p><p>After, that post, I will post the GT history of wins and losses with the different coaches, and basically the same criteria of studies for GT. Yes, the criteria for most schools have changed over the years and at Tech, but not to the degree that the coaching had its effect. After the Tech history, I will then produce numerous examples confirming the coach as the catalyst of winning and losing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rodney Kent, post: 26702, member: 923"] I fully believe a team is a mirror image of a coach regardless of the caliber of players he assembles. I believe the coach is the most important ingredient in the process of winning. However, it is true that once a coach has established his credibility as a winner, he naturally attracts better athletes to his program. For this reason, I am going to offer statistics for my view. I will use many coaches and many teams, but will start with a post I made on another board years ago about the same debate. After, that post, I will post the GT history of wins and losses with the different coaches, and basically the same criteria of studies for GT. Yes, the criteria for most schools have changed over the years and at Tech, but not to the degree that the coaching had its effect. After the Tech history, I will then produce numerous examples confirming the coach as the catalyst of winning and losing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
The 2014 ACC Football Championship was played in what city?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
The Linch Pin of Winning
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top