Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lv20gt" data-source="post: 848087" data-attributes="member: 2299"><p>My guess, and this is pure speculation, is that when TStan had to make a hire back in 2018 he knew that regardless of who he could get, and was likely going to be able to attract, it was likely we were in for hard time. The only real way to avoid that was to stay within the coaching tree and that was likely not on the table due to the opinions of donators. Anyways, I think that is why he leaned so heavily into the recruiting aspect. The plan was eat the lean years while you improve recruiting. Then, if need be go try and make a splash hire at the OC and/or DC to try and utilize that talent. If that doesn't work out then he was hoping that it would be better to replace someone who brought in talent and then wasted it than someone who was more scheme oriented if that didn't work out. </p><p></p><p>Offensively, I'm willing to bet what we have seen isn't out of line with the vision he had with the hire and the timeline sets up for a good hire at OC to provide what we need on that side. Losing Gibbs hurts that prospect but it doesn't really change that dynamic of it. </p><p></p><p>Defense is the side the likely has him at ends as there's no real good reason for why we had the issues we had, especially in the secondary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lv20gt, post: 848087, member: 2299"] My guess, and this is pure speculation, is that when TStan had to make a hire back in 2018 he knew that regardless of who he could get, and was likely going to be able to attract, it was likely we were in for hard time. The only real way to avoid that was to stay within the coaching tree and that was likely not on the table due to the opinions of donators. Anyways, I think that is why he leaned so heavily into the recruiting aspect. The plan was eat the lean years while you improve recruiting. Then, if need be go try and make a splash hire at the OC and/or DC to try and utilize that talent. If that doesn't work out then he was hoping that it would be better to replace someone who brought in talent and then wasted it than someone who was more scheme oriented if that didn't work out. Offensively, I'm willing to bet what we have seen isn't out of line with the vision he had with the hire and the timeline sets up for a good hire at OC to provide what we need on that side. Losing Gibbs hurts that prospect but it doesn't really change that dynamic of it. Defense is the side the likely has him at ends as there's no real good reason for why we had the issues we had, especially in the secondary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stansbury
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top