Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stanford is a better program than GT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GravyTrain" data-source="post: 7674" data-attributes="member: 206"><p>It's very easy to simply dismiss the responses of others as excuses, while making no attempts to offer up insight and answer one's own question.</p><p></p><p>If a limited curriculum is considered a challenge, is it not part of what is holding Georgia Tech back as a football program? Why then discard it as a "crutch" and an "excuse"? It still ends up being part of the "why" and not the "how", but you need to first identify the main problems before you can begin to brainstorm the solutions.</p><p></p><p>I don't agree with using Stanford as the measuring stick. Its apples to oranges, and probably little to no people on this board understand and are deeply familiar with all things Stanford for this exercise to be useful.</p><p></p><p>So lets stop with the why can't we be more like Stanford or Alabama. We are neither. There is nothing wrong with asking why and how GT can improve as a football program. Every fan wants their program to be better. It's just that these nothing really comes out of these conversations except name-calling, ****-measuring, program bashing and other behaviors that Eric and the mods have tried to avoid happening on this board.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GravyTrain, post: 7674, member: 206"] It's very easy to simply dismiss the responses of others as excuses, while making no attempts to offer up insight and answer one's own question. If a limited curriculum is considered a challenge, is it not part of what is holding Georgia Tech back as a football program? Why then discard it as a "crutch" and an "excuse"? It still ends up being part of the "why" and not the "how", but you need to first identify the main problems before you can begin to brainstorm the solutions. I don't agree with using Stanford as the measuring stick. Its apples to oranges, and probably little to no people on this board understand and are deeply familiar with all things Stanford for this exercise to be useful. So lets stop with the why can't we be more like Stanford or Alabama. We are neither. There is nothing wrong with asking why and how GT can improve as a football program. Every fan wants their program to be better. It's just that these nothing really comes out of these conversations except name-calling, ****-measuring, program bashing and other behaviors that Eric and the mods have tried to avoid happening on this board. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who made "The Leap" to defeat u(sic)GA in COFH 2016?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Stanford is a better program than GT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top