Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Should CPJ be the coach in 2014?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTJason" data-source="post: 11604" data-attributes="member: 94"><p>It's hard to say. When I think Vandy, NW, and Stanford I think core sciences and medical school (the football players are majoring in communications, I get it.) none of which require application of the principles of Calculus or Computer science. We not only require almost every student to know calculus, but also require them to know how to use calculus. Even INTA, Management, and STAC majors are using it whether they want to admit it or not. Everyone at GT has to know how to program whether it's Java, Python, Jython (not sure if this is still used for Management,) and everyone's favorite: Matlab. Everyone likes to point to "great students" like Andrew Luck, he was an Architectural engineering major. Look that stack of garbage major up, it's a bunch of art classes with some sim city thrown in and basic architecture studio. It's watered down Civ E without the math (no structures course?!?!?) I'm not debating whether those schools are better than GT because obviously they have some selling points over us in a few areas, but if you want a degree from a good school without much work you can skate by at those places. I still try to figure out how Harvard doesn't have the top recruiting class in the nation every year D2 or not. Different priorities I suppose...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTJason, post: 11604, member: 94"] It's hard to say. When I think Vandy, NW, and Stanford I think core sciences and medical school (the football players are majoring in communications, I get it.) none of which require application of the principles of Calculus or Computer science. We not only require almost every student to know calculus, but also require them to know how to use calculus. Even INTA, Management, and STAC majors are using it whether they want to admit it or not. Everyone at GT has to know how to program whether it's Java, Python, Jython (not sure if this is still used for Management,) and everyone's favorite: Matlab. Everyone likes to point to "great students" like Andrew Luck, he was an Architectural engineering major. Look that stack of garbage major up, it's a bunch of art classes with some sim city thrown in and basic architecture studio. It's watered down Civ E without the math (no structures course?!?!?) I'm not debating whether those schools are better than GT because obviously they have some selling points over us in a few areas, but if you want a degree from a good school without much work you can skate by at those places. I still try to figure out how Harvard doesn't have the top recruiting class in the nation every year D2 or not. Different priorities I suppose... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Should CPJ be the coach in 2014?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top