Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Russell Contract?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskey_Clear" data-source="post: 278510" data-attributes="member: 735"><p>Both Nike and UA have produced some unis even uglier than the worst R has at Tech. Both make some very good looking unis also for several teams. R can and has made good looking unis for Tech. Most every fan fave that has been posted here is.....a R design. Just in different periods / eras / years.</p><p></p><p>That said, R is pretty much done in this arena. I don't like Nike, never have, never will. Most of their "cool new designs" are not at all conservative and would be hated here if you switched that swoosh for a R imo.</p><p></p><p>UA appeals to me more for several reasons (see Nike hate above). I've been wearing their stuff for over a decade and it's always good quality high performance wear. They've been innovativing and get copied like crazy by all the others, particularly when it comes to dry whick apparel. I can't speak at all on the quality of their cleats / footwear.</p><p></p><p>But back to hated Nike. They will always favor the mutts over us if we go with them. Also, any company that puts the silhouette of a bball player on a football uni doesn't deserve to make football unis anymore. I don't care how popular that stupid crap is "with the kids". Put the silhouette of a famous footballer on it and we can talk. Eff Nike.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskey_Clear, post: 278510, member: 735"] Both Nike and UA have produced some unis even uglier than the worst R has at Tech. Both make some very good looking unis also for several teams. R can and has made good looking unis for Tech. Most every fan fave that has been posted here is.....a R design. Just in different periods / eras / years. That said, R is pretty much done in this arena. I don't like Nike, never have, never will. Most of their "cool new designs" are not at all conservative and would be hated here if you switched that swoosh for a R imo. UA appeals to me more for several reasons (see Nike hate above). I've been wearing their stuff for over a decade and it's always good quality high performance wear. They've been innovativing and get copied like crazy by all the others, particularly when it comes to dry whick apparel. I can't speak at all on the quality of their cleats / footwear. But back to hated Nike. They will always favor the mutts over us if we go with them. Also, any company that puts the silhouette of a bball player on a football uni doesn't deserve to make football unis anymore. I don't care how popular that stupid crap is "with the kids". Put the silhouette of a famous footballer on it and we can talk. Eff Nike. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Russell Contract?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top