Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting Bias...247
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 32398" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>I think it works both ways. Say a 3 star is bumped up because they just committed to a "factory" school...well, how do you know the evaluators didn't go back and look at the tape precisely BECAUSE factories schools are offering? Isn't it an exercise by our fanbase to defend recruits by citing what FBS level schools our recruits are offerred? Part of ranking recruits is based on demand...if recruits are in high demad by top tier schools, then maybe they should be rated higher. That happened with Vad Lee after his senior season and a bunch of schools started offering him.</p><p> </p><p>I don't think it's any more silly to bump a 3 star to a 4 because he commited to us, then it is when a 2 star recruits commits to us then they get bumped to a 3. If our recruit never committed to us, he most likely remains a 2 star. It's because he commits to us, is certain instances, that he gets "re-evaluated" (ahem) and gets bumped up. No different than what other recruits that commit to factories are getting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 32398, member: 360"] I think it works both ways. Say a 3 star is bumped up because they just committed to a "factory" school...well, how do you know the evaluators didn't go back and look at the tape precisely BECAUSE factories schools are offering? Isn't it an exercise by our fanbase to defend recruits by citing what FBS level schools our recruits are offerred? Part of ranking recruits is based on demand...if recruits are in high demad by top tier schools, then maybe they should be rated higher. That happened with Vad Lee after his senior season and a bunch of schools started offering him. I don't think it's any more silly to bump a 3 star to a 4 because he commited to us, then it is when a 2 star recruits commits to us then they get bumped to a 3. If our recruit never committed to us, he most likely remains a 2 star. It's because he commits to us, is certain instances, that he gets "re-evaluated" (ahem) and gets bumped up. No different than what other recruits that commit to factories are getting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Recruiting Bias...247
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top