Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Scheme Q&A Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce Wayne" data-source="post: 77222" data-attributes="member: 231"><p>Or there are many more options for explanations then the strict dichotomy you propose? </p><p></p><p>Ferreting out the various causes within individual cases and trying to come up with a really broadly applicable "rule" like "it takes a long time to learn to play in this OL" and "it doesn't take a long time to learn . . . " seems a fruitless endeavor to me. I don't see how one can form really strong opinions on the "rule" or "principle" at stake about getting game time snaps on the offensive line?</p><p></p><p>Also two games that were technically close until the fourth quarter and had a below average number of total snaps just isn't enough data anyway.</p><p></p><p>Oh! and as far as concerns about depth go. I really was bothered that our defensive starters would be so worn down late in games under Groh and their performance was <em>clearly</em> suffering as the game wore on . . . and yet he did not work backups in more. But in these first two games I do not think I have seen the offensive line starters clearly wearing down and performing <em>worse</em> as the game wore on. Hence, I am not as concerned about our depth or whether the backups have been getting real game experience to this point. I recognize it is good to get them some (out of injury concern and other reasons as GTNavy Nuke listed elsewhere) and obviously CPJ has indicated the same. But I don't think it is all that big a deal at this stage. Let's check back on the issue after the next 2 games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce Wayne, post: 77222, member: 231"] Or there are many more options for explanations then the strict dichotomy you propose? Ferreting out the various causes within individual cases and trying to come up with a really broadly applicable "rule" like "it takes a long time to learn to play in this OL" and "it doesn't take a long time to learn . . . " seems a fruitless endeavor to me. I don't see how one can form really strong opinions on the "rule" or "principle" at stake about getting game time snaps on the offensive line? Also two games that were technically close until the fourth quarter and had a below average number of total snaps just isn't enough data anyway. Oh! and as far as concerns about depth go. I really was bothered that our defensive starters would be so worn down late in games under Groh and their performance was [I]clearly[/I] suffering as the game wore on . . . and yet he did not work backups in more. But in these first two games I do not think I have seen the offensive line starters clearly wearing down and performing [I]worse[/I] as the game wore on. Hence, I am not as concerned about our depth or whether the backups have been getting real game experience to this point. I recognize it is good to get them some (out of injury concern and other reasons as GTNavy Nuke listed elsewhere) and obviously CPJ has indicated the same. But I don't think it is all that big a deal at this stage. Let's check back on the issue after the next 2 games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Justin Thomas wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Scheme Q&A Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top