Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Scheme Q&A Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTYellowJacket12" data-source="post: 34632" data-attributes="member: 241"><p>Looking at the "Should Autry (the frosh) be a WR?" thread got me thinking about an old question I've had since I've started watching CPJ at tech: Why we never send out one of the ABs into the flat based on pre-snap reads so that we can get a fast AB type (like Autry) mismatched against a LB? It seems like we can still run basic read option plays out of this formation so our offense would retain its core principles yet we would have the advantage of a built in mismatch every down (AB vs LB), unless the defense goes to nickel and if we get them to go to nickel we can run to the nickel corner side since they're notoriously bad tacklers.</p><p></p><p>Would this be too difficult to implement? It seems to me like this variation adds a vertical threat without sacrificing the knowledge of basic reads our QB has. What are the advantages/disadvantages to this wrinkle?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTYellowJacket12, post: 34632, member: 241"] Looking at the "Should Autry (the frosh) be a WR?" thread got me thinking about an old question I've had since I've started watching CPJ at tech: Why we never send out one of the ABs into the flat based on pre-snap reads so that we can get a fast AB type (like Autry) mismatched against a LB? It seems like we can still run basic read option plays out of this formation so our offense would retain its core principles yet we would have the advantage of a built in mismatch every down (AB vs LB), unless the defense goes to nickel and if we get them to go to nickel we can run to the nickel corner side since they're notoriously bad tacklers. Would this be too difficult to implement? It seems to me like this variation adds a vertical threat without sacrificing the knowledge of basic reads our QB has. What are the advantages/disadvantages to this wrinkle? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Offensive Scheme Q&A Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top