Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
NY Times Story on Lack of Jameis Winston Investigation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AE 87" data-source="post: 43867" data-attributes="member: 195"><p>Sarcasm, really? (do you see what I did there?) I think if you look, you'll see that most of the "facts" damaging to Winston were reported as the accuser's story, therefore not open to lawsuits.</p><p></p><p>Do you not remember the reporting surrounding the Duke Lacrosse team or George Zimmerman? You didn't answer my question whether you would want your son to go through the media circus and resulting trial because of a false accusation in order to affirm your view that there is never a situation in which rape allegations should not be pursued as guilty until proven innocent. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Seriously, the article simply reports her side of the story, leaves out questions about the story, mentions data (the cell phone video) but does not report that it, if it existed, refutes the accuser's side of the story. I agree that more police work should have been done, but if the story given by the TPD detectives holds any truth, I can understand why they made the wrong decision they made. Still, I disagree with people saying they believe the accuser's family and don't believe the police based on that article. It even has the woman's attorney admit that the accuser became hesitant at the time the police say she stopped cooperating.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AE 87, post: 43867, member: 195"] Sarcasm, really? (do you see what I did there?) I think if you look, you'll see that most of the "facts" damaging to Winston were reported as the accuser's story, therefore not open to lawsuits. Do you not remember the reporting surrounding the Duke Lacrosse team or George Zimmerman? You didn't answer my question whether you would want your son to go through the media circus and resulting trial because of a false accusation in order to affirm your view that there is never a situation in which rape allegations should not be pursued as guilty until proven innocent. Seriously, the article simply reports her side of the story, leaves out questions about the story, mentions data (the cell phone video) but does not report that it, if it existed, refutes the accuser's side of the story. I agree that more police work should have been done, but if the story given by the TPD detectives holds any truth, I can understand why they made the wrong decision they made. Still, I disagree with people saying they believe the accuser's family and don't believe the police based on that article. It even has the woman's attorney admit that the accuser became hesitant at the time the police say she stopped cooperating. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the name of Georgia Tech's mascot?
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Topics
College & Pro Sports
NY Times Story on Lack of Jameis Winston Investigation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top