Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NCAA v. Alston in the Supreme Court
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 792934" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>The oral arguments look bad for the NCAA. However, long time court observers (reporters, lawyers, et al) usually caution “don’t pay too much attention to the oral arguments”.</p><p>Even so, it still looks bad for the NCAA.</p><p>Regarding the NCAA protecting small schools: the NCAA protects itself. It needs the big schools and the small schools. It needs the. It needs the big schools more, but without the small and medium schools it doesn’t exist. So it plays a game that looks like a weird balancing act from outside.</p><p>I hold some opinions that probably look contradictory</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The NCAA unfairly profits from players’ labor</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Players should get paid for their work </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fans would rather watch college sports than minor league sports</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">College sports probably won’t survive a shift to pro/minor league free markets </li> </ul><p>The NFL and other pro leagues aren’t free markets either. Baseball might be the closest to free market</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 792934, member: 282"] The oral arguments look bad for the NCAA. However, long time court observers (reporters, lawyers, et al) usually caution “don’t pay too much attention to the oral arguments”. Even so, it still looks bad for the NCAA. Regarding the NCAA protecting small schools: the NCAA protects itself. It needs the big schools and the small schools. It needs the. It needs the big schools more, but without the small and medium schools it doesn’t exist. So it plays a game that looks like a weird balancing act from outside. I hold some opinions that probably look contradictory [LIST] [*]The NCAA unfairly profits from players’ labor [*]Players should get paid for their work [*]Fans would rather watch college sports than minor league sports [*]College sports probably won’t survive a shift to pro/minor league free markets [/LIST] The NFL and other pro leagues aren’t free markets either. Baseball might be the closest to free market [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What jersey number did Joshua Nesbitt wear?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Basketball
NCAA v. Alston in the Supreme Court
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top