Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NAVY......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stpetewreck" data-source="post: 258336" data-attributes="member: 967"><p>I've only watched the first series of the Navy - Memphis game, and I already feel comfortable saying to the people that believe Navy is running our offense faster:</p><p></p><p>You may very well be comparing two completely different plays. Navy is running a ton (in the 1st series against Memphis, and I assume the whole game..Not there yet) of Midline Triple options plays....and regardless of personnel it ALMOST ALWAYS hits faster/develops much faster that the Veer or "regular" triple option. The midline triple is in the Vine that longest day posted above.</p><p></p><p>If you want to see us run that play, and see us run "our option faster", look no further than the 2014 (I'm pretty sure) spring game. Also the 2015 Miami game very well might be about the same. In the 2014 spring game (if I'm thinking of the correct one), JT kinds tweaked his ankle on a long run to the end zone and sat the rest of the game, after like 1 series I believe. So Tim Byerly plays the WHOLE spring game at QB. We ran a ton of midline (we'd NEVER do that with JT in a SPRING GAME), and a ton of midline triple options plays. Not only does it generally hit faster to the A-back on a pitch, but it's two plays where you can feel like the QB isn't spectacular, and then go look at the stat sheets (just like that spring game) and notice the QB accumulated (again, like Tim Bylery did in that spring game) 125 yards on the ground with very few long, long runs throughout the entirety of the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stpetewreck, post: 258336, member: 967"] I've only watched the first series of the Navy - Memphis game, and I already feel comfortable saying to the people that believe Navy is running our offense faster: You may very well be comparing two completely different plays. Navy is running a ton (in the 1st series against Memphis, and I assume the whole game..Not there yet) of Midline Triple options plays....and regardless of personnel it ALMOST ALWAYS hits faster/develops much faster that the Veer or "regular" triple option. The midline triple is in the Vine that longest day posted above. If you want to see us run that play, and see us run "our option faster", look no further than the 2014 (I'm pretty sure) spring game. Also the 2015 Miami game very well might be about the same. In the 2014 spring game (if I'm thinking of the correct one), JT kinds tweaked his ankle on a long run to the end zone and sat the rest of the game, after like 1 series I believe. So Tim Byerly plays the WHOLE spring game at QB. We ran a ton of midline (we'd NEVER do that with JT in a SPRING GAME), and a ton of midline triple options plays. Not only does it generally hit faster to the A-back on a pitch, but it's two plays where you can feel like the QB isn't spectacular, and then go look at the stat sheets (just like that spring game) and notice the QB accumulated (again, like Tim Bylery did in that spring game) 125 yards on the ground with very few long, long runs throughout the entirety of the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
NAVY......
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top