SimpleGT
Jolly Good Fellow
- Messages
- 141
- Location
- Simpsonville SC
I just plain want more beesball, deserved or not, Danny ball or not. The break between the end of college baseball and the start of football is just too d---d long
I think the fans that are upset are also pretty vocal. That's how that tends to go.Whenever I check in with this thread, which is pretty infrequently to be honest, I am struck by the total lack of excitement about this program.
I agree 100%. I don't understand why a team should get credit for playing good teams but LOSING to them. Beat them and that is a totally different story. But why give any team credit at the end of the season for playing some good teams and losing by double digits or even a few runs. The emphasis should be on wins and then further emphasis on quality wins. There should be no such thing as quality losses which is essentially what RPI does.This is EXACTLY why I can't stand RPI
Strength of schedule outweighs winning/losing which isn't right
You shouldn't get punished for a win. Now losing is a completely different story to a bad team.
Wofford beat Samford in the 1st game today and has put up a 4 spot in the top of the 1st in game 2. If they can get enough pitching to close that game out in would be real helpful to us as Samford's 88 RPI isn't going to get them an at-large, but Wofford's 50 RPI puts them in competition with us for a bubble spot.My updated bubble looks like this:
61) Coastal Carolina
62) Charleston <-- Must beat UNC-Wilmington twice tomorrow to win their tournament
63) UConn <-- Sorry Fitted, I'm being wishy-washy and put them back in.
64) TCU
65) Georgia Tech
66) Indiana <-- Lost twice to Nebraska today
67) Kansas St
68) Wofford <-- Have won 4 games this week, must beat Samford twice tomorrow
I sure hope Fitted Jacket is right about UConn, that might just get us in the tourney!!!
I couldn't agree more.I agree 100%. I don't understand why a team should get credit for playing good teams but LOSING to them. Beat them and that is a totally different story. But why give any team credit at the end of the season for playing some good teams and losing by double digits or even a few runs. The emphasis should be on wins and then further emphasis on quality wins. There should be no such thing as quality losses which is essentially what RPI does.
Correct... if you remove all the good non conference opponents (UGA) from the schedule.... it's obvious we schedule bad non conference opponents.Turns out this is not a new problem. I went back and looked at our weekend series over the past 5 years. If you exclude the UGA series (who we play every year anyway), the average RPI of our weekend opponents is 213. We’re 5-8 against UGA during the same period.
It’s making more sense to me now. Since the 2011 season, we have managed 3 winning conference seasons in 13 tries, one being the 2-1 COVID season. On the other hand, we’ve been very successful out of conference. And that’s because we schedule, for the most part, trash teams. CDH’s active wins leader status is largely built on beating up on overmatched teams.
2024:
Radford (16-34 RPI 254)
Cornell (17-21 RPI 212)
Youngstown St (16-44 RPI 284)
UGA (39-15)
2023:
Miami OH (21-35 RPI 245)
Tennessee Tech (21-34 RPI 249)
UGA (29-27)
Gardner Webb (31-25 RPI 154)
2022:
Wright State (30-27 RPI 143)
Gardner Webb (23-36 RPI 235)
UGA (36-23)
2021:
E Kentucky (21-32 RPI 198)
Kennesaw State (29-22 RPI 143)
2020:
Atlanta “Challenge” (3 teams combined 13-32 average RPI 259)
Ohio State (6-8 RPI 140)
UGA (14-4)
Bowling Green (2-11 RPI 254) - season canceled before series played
Don’t you know the old GT adage…”Good things never happen to us (athletically speaking)”I can see the difficulty in picking these last few teams. Thankfully, unlike football, we are talking about teams who will likely just be cannon fodder in the regionals and not teams with a legit chance of winning the championship. I'm certainly glad that football is making that issue better for next season, but they still have work to do in that regard. Anyway, here is my field of 64, not completely unbiased, I admit:
Last Four In: Coastal Carolina, Indiana, TCU, Georgia Tech
First Four Out: UConn, Kansas St, California, Xavier
SEC (10): Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Texas A&M, Georgia, Mississippi St, South Carolina, LSU, Alabama, Vanderbilt
ACC (8): Duke, Florida St, North Carolina, Clemson, NC State, Virginia, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech
Big 12 (6): Oklahoma St, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Texas, Central Florida, TCU
Sun Belt (4): Southern Miss, Louisiana, Coastal Carolina, James Madison
Big Ten (3): Illinois, Nebraska, Indiana
Coastal (3): UNC-Wilmington, Northeastern, Charleston
PAC-12 (3): Arizona, Oregon St, Oregon
AAC (2): East Carolina, Tulane
Big West (2): UC-Santa Barbara, UC-Irvine
Conference USA (2): Dallas Baptist, Louisiana Tech
Missouri Valley (2): Evansville, Indiana St
Big East (1): St. John's
Southern (1): Wofford
Southland (1): Nicholls
West Coast (1): San Diego
Other Leagues (15): Clear one bid leagues
Notes:
Fitted may be interested that in the end he won me over, I left out UConn. Let's hope he is right, as I have us as the last team in, UConn the first team out.
Unlike D1 Baseball I don't have Florida in. As several have posted well earlier today, I'm not going to reward them for scheduling tough and losing.
On the flip side, Northeastern (IMO) has to be in. Next to what the committee does with us I will be watching the what they do with Florida and Northeastern next most closely.
The only clear stolen bids that I see are Evansville in the MVC and Tulane in the AAC. That may turn out to be crucial for us.
Hoping I’m right about UCONN and Big Least…I can see the difficulty in picking these last few teams. Thankfully, unlike football, we are talking about teams who will likely just be cannon fodder in the regionals and not teams with a legit chance of winning the championship. I'm certainly glad that football is making that issue better for next season, but they still have work to do in that regard. Anyway, here is my field of 64, not completely unbiased, I admit:
Last Four In: Coastal Carolina, Indiana, TCU, Georgia Tech
First Four Out: UConn, Kansas St, California, Xavier
SEC (10): Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Texas A&M, Georgia, Mississippi St, South Carolina, LSU, Alabama, Vanderbilt
ACC (8): Duke, Florida St, North Carolina, Clemson, NC State, Virginia, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech
Big 12 (6): Oklahoma St, Oklahoma, West Virginia, Texas, Central Florida, TCU
Sun Belt (4): Southern Miss, Louisiana, Coastal Carolina, James Madison
Big Ten (3): Illinois, Nebraska, Indiana
Coastal (3): UNC-Wilmington, Northeastern, Charleston
PAC-12 (3): Arizona, Oregon St, Oregon
AAC (2): East Carolina, Tulane
Big West (2): UC-Santa Barbara, UC-Irvine
Conference USA (2): Dallas Baptist, Louisiana Tech
Missouri Valley (2): Evansville, Indiana St
Big East (1): St. John's
Southern (1): Wofford
Southland (1): Nicholls
West Coast (1): San Diego
Other Leagues (15): Clear one bid leagues
Notes:
Fitted may be interested that in the end he won me over, I left out UConn. Let's hope he is right, as I have us as the last team in, UConn the first team out.
Unlike D1 Baseball I don't have Florida in. As several have posted well earlier today, I'm not going to reward them for scheduling tough and losing.
On the flip side, Northeastern (IMO) has to be in. Next to what the committee does with us I will be watching the what they do with Florida and Northeastern next most closely.
The only clear stolen bids that I see are Evansville in the MVC and Tulane in the AAC. That may turn out to be crucial for us.