Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How do we feel about our wide receivers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 28469" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>I knew someone was going to quote those misleading stats. </p><p></p><p>That's pretty much why I left this out:</p><p></p><p>2009Rating Outcome</p><p>Jax St 192.2 W 37-17</p><p>Clemson 42.7 W 30-27</p><p>Miami 136.5 L 17-33</p><p>UNC 131.6 W 24-7</p><p>Miss St 261.7 W 42-31</p><p>FSU 228.8 W 49-44</p><p>VT 46.9 W 28-23</p><p>UVA 139.3 W 34-9</p><p>Vandy 221.6 W 56-31</p><p>Wake For 44.9 W 30-27</p><p>Duke 289.9 W 49-10</p><p>UGA 172 L 30-24</p><p>Clem 148.3 W 39-34</p><p>Iowa 11.2 L 14-24</p><p></p><p></p><p>2011 Rating Outcome</p><p>W. Car. 312.8 W 63-21</p><p>MTSU 357.2 W 49-21</p><p>Kansas 348.2 W 66-24</p><p>UNC 191.1 W35-28</p><p>NC St 170.2 W 45-35</p><p>Maryland 71.5 W 21-16</p><p>UVA 0.2 L 21-24</p><p>Miami 77.4 L 7-24</p><p>Clemson 78.2 W 31-17</p><p>VT 131.5 L 26-37</p><p>Duke 165.7 W 38-31</p><p>UGA 18.6 L 17-31</p><p>Utah 172.1 L 27-30</p><p></p><p>2013 Rating Outcome</p><p>Elon 268 W 70-0 </p><p>Duke 185.6 L 14-38 </p><p>UNC 158.6 W 28-20 </p><p>VT 62.9 L 10-17 </p><p>Miami 63.8 L 30-45 </p><p>BYU 80.9 L 20-38 JT (4/4 1 TD 245.5)</p><p>Syracuse 456.4 W 56-0 </p><p>UVA 146 W 35-25 </p><p>Pitt 120.6 W 21-10 </p><p>Clemson 108.1 L 31-55 JT (2/3 1 TD 142.3)</p><p>AL A&M 66.9 W 66-7 JT (1/2 0TD 201.2)</p><p>UGA 143.9 L 34-41 </p><p>Ole Miss 109.7 L 17-25 </p><p></p><p>For the stats above, I quoted the QB that attempted the most passes since I couldn't find a site with total efficiency for each team per game.</p><p></p><p>2009 is definitely CPJ's most consistent passing year. There were some very low lows, but our passing attack also delivered against some stout competition (FSU, UGA). I won't even say it's because we had BeyBey because CPJ took advantage of him and that's what good coaches do...they take advantage of good players. That's what good coaches do with their passing offense.</p><p></p><p>In 2011 Tevin started ON FIRE against some pretty putrid competition, then when the competition increased, our passing game took a nosedive. </p><p></p><p>2013 is pretty self explanatory.</p><p></p><p>I think I am being pretty accurate when I say CPJ has a hard time CONSISTENTLY fielding a good passing game. Our stats are pumped up against the lower tier teams, and when we need a passing attack to help us win, the passing game fails us. The stats above bear that out. I just love when I point out how other teams can be highly accurate AND efficient and someone says it's "beside the point" because it doesn't fit their motive.</p><p></p><p>People can defend CPJ's passing however they want. But our record and inability to keep the good defenses honest and make them pay for stacking the box against us bears it out. No one respects our passing game, and that ultimately speaks more about our passing than any pumped up efficiency rating anyone wants to quote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 28469, member: 360"] I knew someone was going to quote those misleading stats. That's pretty much why I left this out: 2009Rating Outcome Jax St 192.2 W 37-17 Clemson 42.7 W 30-27 Miami 136.5 L 17-33 UNC 131.6 W 24-7 Miss St 261.7 W 42-31 FSU 228.8 W 49-44 VT 46.9 W 28-23 UVA 139.3 W 34-9 Vandy 221.6 W 56-31 Wake For 44.9 W 30-27 Duke 289.9 W 49-10 UGA 172 L 30-24 Clem 148.3 W 39-34 Iowa 11.2 L 14-24 2011 Rating Outcome W. Car. 312.8 W 63-21 MTSU 357.2 W 49-21 Kansas 348.2 W 66-24 UNC 191.1 W35-28 NC St 170.2 W 45-35 Maryland 71.5 W 21-16 UVA 0.2 L 21-24 Miami 77.4 L 7-24 Clemson 78.2 W 31-17 VT 131.5 L 26-37 Duke 165.7 W 38-31 UGA 18.6 L 17-31 Utah 172.1 L 27-30 2013 Rating Outcome Elon 268 W 70-0 Duke 185.6 L 14-38 UNC 158.6 W 28-20 VT 62.9 L 10-17 Miami 63.8 L 30-45 BYU 80.9 L 20-38 JT (4/4 1 TD 245.5) Syracuse 456.4 W 56-0 UVA 146 W 35-25 Pitt 120.6 W 21-10 Clemson 108.1 L 31-55 JT (2/3 1 TD 142.3) AL A&M 66.9 W 66-7 JT (1/2 0TD 201.2) UGA 143.9 L 34-41 Ole Miss 109.7 L 17-25 For the stats above, I quoted the QB that attempted the most passes since I couldn't find a site with total efficiency for each team per game. 2009 is definitely CPJ's most consistent passing year. There were some very low lows, but our passing attack also delivered against some stout competition (FSU, UGA). I won't even say it's because we had BeyBey because CPJ took advantage of him and that's what good coaches do...they take advantage of good players. That's what good coaches do with their passing offense. In 2011 Tevin started ON FIRE against some pretty putrid competition, then when the competition increased, our passing game took a nosedive. 2013 is pretty self explanatory. I think I am being pretty accurate when I say CPJ has a hard time CONSISTENTLY fielding a good passing game. Our stats are pumped up against the lower tier teams, and when we need a passing attack to help us win, the passing game fails us. The stats above bear that out. I just love when I point out how other teams can be highly accurate AND efficient and someone says it's "beside the point" because it doesn't fit their motive. People can defend CPJ's passing however they want. But our record and inability to keep the good defenses honest and make them pay for stacking the box against us bears it out. No one respects our passing game, and that ultimately speaks more about our passing than any pumped up efficiency rating anyone wants to quote. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
How do we feel about our wide receivers?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top