Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dressedcheeseside" data-source="post: 26932" data-attributes="member: 77"><p>What I said is true. You can believe what you want.</p><p></p><p>Your tone is borderline acceptable, but I'll respond anyway.</p><p></p><p>It's absolutely true that schools use different criteria in reporting recruiting expenses. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/08/31/the-economics-of-college-football-what-the-top-25-spend-on-recruiting/" target="_blank">http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/08/31/the-economics-of-college-football-what-the-top-25-spend-on-recruiting/</a></p><p></p><p>It would be nice if you included some quotes or links in your argument, too. </p><p></p><p>From the same article I found this gem:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even though the methodology is flawed, I'll still concede that GT spends a lot on recruiting. Maybe we spend a lot because we have a larger geographic footprint to cover? Maybe we have a small subset of targets spread over a humongous area? Spending does not directly correlate to wins and losses. That is very simplistic thinking. The formula for winning at GT is very complex. That said, I think we should spend even more in this department. </p><p></p><p>The Service Academies spend more than anybody. I guess their coaches should be fired if they don't place in the top 5 every year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dressedcheeseside, post: 26932, member: 77"] What I said is true. You can believe what you want. Your tone is borderline acceptable, but I'll respond anyway. It's absolutely true that schools use different criteria in reporting recruiting expenses. [url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/aliciajessop/2013/08/31/the-economics-of-college-football-what-the-top-25-spend-on-recruiting/[/url] It would be nice if you included some quotes or links in your argument, too. From the same article I found this gem: Even though the methodology is flawed, I'll still concede that GT spends a lot on recruiting. Maybe we spend a lot because we have a larger geographic footprint to cover? Maybe we have a small subset of targets spread over a humongous area? Spending does not directly correlate to wins and losses. That is very simplistic thinking. The formula for winning at GT is very complex. That said, I think we should spend even more in this department. The Service Academies spend more than anybody. I guess their coaches should be fired if they don't place in the top 5 every year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top