Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Atomic Jacket" data-source="post: 26551" data-attributes="member: 1008"><p>Final Sagarin Predictor (Pure Points) ACC Rankings</p><p></p><p>1. Florida State</p><p>16. Clemson</p><p>35. Georgia Tech</p><p>39. North Carolina</p><p>46. Virginia Tech</p><p>48. Duke</p><p>53. Miami</p><p>58. Pittsburgh</p><p>64. Boston College</p><p>66. Syracuse</p><p>72. Maryland</p><p>98. Wake Forest</p><p>108. NC State</p><p>112. Virginia</p><p></p><p>Interesting results I noticed when I glanced at the Sagarin rankings post-bowl season. I only consider the Predictor (Pure Points) column, because it tends to be the most accurate. Not that I'm trying to defend Tech's record, but we didn't do too badly when you look at the rest of the conference. We'd be considered "upper tier" of the ACC. Incidentally, Georgia finished #25.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/" target="_blank">http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/</a></p><p></p><p>(Edited to add Pitt & Syracuse. Oops.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Atomic Jacket, post: 26551, member: 1008"] Final Sagarin Predictor (Pure Points) ACC Rankings 1. Florida State 16. Clemson 35. Georgia Tech 39. North Carolina 46. Virginia Tech 48. Duke 53. Miami 58. Pittsburgh 64. Boston College 66. Syracuse 72. Maryland 98. Wake Forest 108. NC State 112. Virginia Interesting results I noticed when I glanced at the Sagarin rankings post-bowl season. I only consider the Predictor (Pure Points) column, because it tends to be the most accurate. Not that I'm trying to defend Tech's record, but we didn't do too badly when you look at the rest of the conference. We'd be considered "upper tier" of the ACC. Incidentally, Georgia finished #25. [url]http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/[/url] (Edited to add Pitt & Syracuse. Oops.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Hot seat
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top