Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT ranks #33 in football program monetary value
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Techster" data-source="post: 61245" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>The problem is YOU are trying to define something...when in reality, STEM only refers to a designation for a degree (see Cyp's wiki link). You can LOL all you want, but just because you narrowly define something (which BTW, favors your argument...LOL how that works, huh?) doesn't make it a defining mark for the rest of us to follow. YOU are trying to make GT out to be this Fort Knox of getting kids into GT and keeping them in, when in reality it's obviously more difficult than factory schools but not impossible.</p><p></p><p>Yet you are ignoring the obvious: GT is doing REALLY well right now in recruiting because of the reasons I spelled out in my earlier posts. LOL how you're still arguing against some idea in your head when the reality of what's going on with our 2015 class spells out the potential of what GT can be once the staff finally "gets it". Like I said earlier, GT may be STEM heavy, but that doesn't deter us from recruiting well (currently a top 30 class) and getting kids into GT that are capable of the work. The current class certainly blows holes into the antiquated recruiting excuses posters like you keep holding onto.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Techster, post: 61245, member: 360"] The problem is YOU are trying to define something...when in reality, STEM only refers to a designation for a degree (see Cyp's wiki link). You can LOL all you want, but just because you narrowly define something (which BTW, favors your argument...LOL how that works, huh?) doesn't make it a defining mark for the rest of us to follow. YOU are trying to make GT out to be this Fort Knox of getting kids into GT and keeping them in, when in reality it's obviously more difficult than factory schools but not impossible. Yet you are ignoring the obvious: GT is doing REALLY well right now in recruiting because of the reasons I spelled out in my earlier posts. LOL how you're still arguing against some idea in your head when the reality of what's going on with our 2015 class spells out the potential of what GT can be once the staff finally "gets it". Like I said earlier, GT may be STEM heavy, but that doesn't deter us from recruiting well (currently a top 30 class) and getting kids into GT that are capable of the work. The current class certainly blows holes into the antiquated recruiting excuses posters like you keep holding onto. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
GT ranks #33 in football program monetary value
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top