GT Owns and Operates sanford Stadium

[Augusta_Jacket]

According to Wikipedia, The Georgia Institute of Technology "owns and operates" Sanford Stadium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_Stadium

Get your screenshots before they figure out they've been hacked.

 

[Supersizethatorder-mutt]

I was hoping you would post that. Note the tenants at the bottom are Georgia Tech football 2014-18. LOL !!!

 

[buzz_wiser©]

Haha! love this!

 

[GTJoeBrew]

Props to whoever did that!

 

[lauraee]

Already fixed it. . Anyone have a screenshot?

 

[GTJoeBrew]

 

[lauraee]

Thanks!!

 

[GTJoeBrew]

It's still up though:

 

[TheTechGuy]

It's still up though:


View attachment 2382

UGA students and alumni can't operate computers. May be up for good...

 

[Supersizethatorder-mutt]

It's still up though:


View attachment 2382

Someone already fixed the dates of our tenancy from 2014-18 to 2014, 2016. I thought the original was better, because it predicted our win there again in 2018.

 

[GTpdm]

Someone really needs to edit the "Notable Sanford Stadium Games" section (near the middle of the article) to include December 1, 1984 and November 29, 2014.

 

[BuzzStone]

Such a good harmless prank

 

[B Lifsey]

FUNNY...

They will probably press charges against whoever did that!!!

 

[Fatmike91]

The "owner" is now Paul Johnson. Yep - someone's definitely going to jail for this.

/

 

[northgajacket]

Wonder how long it takes before the barking bumpkins act like someone committed a heinous crime?

 

[takethepoints]

And now everybody here who depends on wikipedia for information has an idea why this is a pretty bad idea when it comes to any topic with political, symbolic, religious, or even athletic connotations. It's generally reliable, but this whole business of letting the users "correct" information in the entries is getting out of hand. In the early days they could control the trolls and tricksters. Now the thing is too big to monitor.

Too bad. I used to depend on it. Now I have to double-check any data I want to use in anything vaguely serious. Even e-mails.

 

[dressedcheeseside]

And now everybody here who depends on wikipedia for information has an idea why this is a pretty bad idea when it comes to any topic with political, symbolic, religious, or even athletic connotations. It's generally reliable, but this whole business of letting the users "correct" information in the entries is getting out of hand. In the early days they could control the trolls and tricksters. Now the thing is too big to monitor.

Too bad. I used to depend on it. Now I have to double-check any data I want to use in anything vaguely serious. Even e-mails.

"Consider the source" should be a guiding principle in all quests for knowledge. At least Wiki entries are required to site sources and provide links to them.

That said, here we are on an anonymous message board that requires zero factual support. Grain of salt.....

 

[JacketFromUGA]

"Consider the source" should be a guiding principle in all quests for knowledge. At least Wiki entries are required to site sources and provide links to them.

That said, here we are on an anonymous message board that requires zero factual support. Grain of salt.....

Whenever someone lists a weight for a player in spring I'm going to smack them with a

 

[MikeJackets]

According to Wikipedia, The Georgia Institute of Technology "owns and operates" Sanford Stadium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_Stadium

Get your screenshots before they figure out they've been hacked.

 

[Josh H]

In all honesty, can we even call it "hacking" when it involves Wikipedia?