Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Game 8 Media Pittsburgh vs. Georgia Tech #PITTvsGT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CuseJacket" data-source="post: 760072" data-attributes="member: 274"><p>Criticism is fine. Praise is as well. Posts making it black/white or either/or are the posts that 1) read like they are the loudest on the board, and 2) rarely if ever influence others.</p><p></p><p>My 2 cents and not to come across as patronizing: I personally see no reason to discount your opinion. My perception is that it is tough for some folks to entertain/digest with the way it's presented. Some concession that there's a middle ground actually will help your argument (same goes for others on either end of the extreme). Including data and then being open to different interpretations around context will encourage good discussion. </p><p></p><p>I think the 24 ppg barometer is a fair one, next year. And there's a good chance we get there over the last 4 games this year. I place a lot of weight on the "weakest link" theory, especially when it comes to OL. Hard to find consistency with a true frosh tackle and sometimes due to injury inserting a walk-on center and LT without other P5 offers (Clark). Add in a true frosh QB and take away a real spring/summer practice, and it's really hard for me to draw conclusive takeaways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CuseJacket, post: 760072, member: 274"] Criticism is fine. Praise is as well. Posts making it black/white or either/or are the posts that 1) read like they are the loudest on the board, and 2) rarely if ever influence others. My 2 cents and not to come across as patronizing: I personally see no reason to discount your opinion. My perception is that it is tough for some folks to entertain/digest with the way it's presented. Some concession that there's a middle ground actually will help your argument (same goes for others on either end of the extreme). Including data and then being open to different interpretations around context will encourage good discussion. I think the 24 ppg barometer is a fair one, next year. And there's a good chance we get there over the last 4 games this year. I place a lot of weight on the "weakest link" theory, especially when it comes to OL. Hard to find consistency with a true frosh tackle and sometimes due to injury inserting a walk-on center and LT without other P5 offers (Clark). Add in a true frosh QB and take away a real spring/summer practice, and it's really hard for me to draw conclusive takeaways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Game 8 Media Pittsburgh vs. Georgia Tech #PITTvsGT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top