He is DC for the Bulls. Spent two years with CPJ. Since Elon was pretty much of a cupcake for them , they have had plenty of time to prepare for us , with some knowledge of how it works. Obviously coaches don't play, players have to execute. But does this give them a significant edge. What say you ??
The speed at which the dive hits is one of the main things that is hard to replicate.I once thought we were hard to prepare for because it is hard to replicate game speed in practice. Seems to me that we run a lot of dives now, which is not hard to replicate, instead of plays on the outside.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The speed at which the dive hits is one of the main things that is hard to replicate.
I once thought we were hard to prepare for because it is hard to replicate game speed in practice. Seems to me that we run a lot of dives now, which is not hard to replicate, instead of plays on the outside.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Okay, fair enough. Would stretching the defense to the outside, at game speed, be even harder to replicate?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looked at the Bulls blog referenced above. Shows that they feel about the same about us as we do about them. Are they delusional, or are we ? Guess we will find out soon enough. Got to say that if we get pressure on the QB, with turnovers or hurries, we should take them. It should become immediately obvious to see the differences between Roof and Woody's defensive approach.No. Basically asking athletes to sprint to the boundary.
It's hard to replicate the speed the dive hits, while avoiding blocks (not just cuts), while being aware that the bb may not have the ball, while maintaining your actual responsibilities on the play, while not getting de-cleated while pursuing the qb, while staying back in case he pitches (or does something wonky), then trying to make a play.
Of course, if we don't do our jobs it gets easier for the defense.
On a semi-related note, the bulls boards seem to think Stingtalk is the only place to find Tech fans. They're pretty confident they're gonna roll us. Here's where you can look at them lookin' at us ...
https://www.thebullspen.com/forum/25-usf-south-florida-bulls-athletics/
On a semi-related note, the bulls boards seem to think Stingtalk is the only place to find Tech fans. They're pretty confident they're gonna roll us. Here's where you can look at them lookin' at us ...
Lol if I was going to send opposing fans anywhere to represent GTs entire fan base - I would DEFINITELY send them to Stingtalk. LOL
Until Marshall is able to hit enough deep throws to keep the safeties from cheating, we will have this problem. they will cheap up and seal the edge to take away the pitch and we have either dive or keeper. Those throws are part and parcel of Johnson's spread offensive planning.I once thought we were hard to prepare for because it is hard to replicate game speed in practice. Seems to me that we run a lot of dives now, which is not hard to replicate, instead of plays on the outside.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It will be hard but we can make it tough for anybody. Besides which I think we win. And it looks to me -- yes, I know, on the basis of one game -- that Clemson is heavy favorites in their division and it is going to be GT or VT on this side. FSU and Miami have been exposed, and while VT as usual with Foster strangled an offense, no, they are not that good. Not yet. What it may do is change Clemson's thinking of the ACC championship, because they probably looked at Miami coming back. Have to hand it to Bud Foster, though. Give him the horses and he will build a defense.This Saturday will give us a good idea of where we are as a team both O and D. If we can't complete some passes, they stack the box and it could be like VT against FSU last night.
Have they joined the clamoring throng that, having practiced against it at every opportunity, say they did nothing special to get ready?They have practiced the option all during the summer. Should be interesting.