Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ESPN Notes on GT
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 81211" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>The Pitt ranking makes sense. I'm surprised we moved all the way to #4, but what does a power ranking mean in week 4 anyway? The up arrow for Pitt means that their team seems to be improving; it's just that we "improved" more. The comments about VT are unfair--they've got a solid D, and their offense ran into a D that started playing well (and that should be the biggest change in our "ranking"). Miami at 11 makes no sense. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/" target="_blank">Sagarin</a> has us in about the same area as VPI, UM, Duke, Syracuse, Pitt, UNC, and NCST in the 41-60 range. It has Duke, VPI, UM, and Syracuse ahead of us (and East Carolina almost tied with us). I think we moved up and VPI moved down a bit, but I can't find last weeks ratings, so I'm not sure how much.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 81211, member: 282"] The Pitt ranking makes sense. I'm surprised we moved all the way to #4, but what does a power ranking mean in week 4 anyway? The up arrow for Pitt means that their team seems to be improving; it's just that we "improved" more. The comments about VT are unfair--they've got a solid D, and their offense ran into a D that started playing well (and that should be the biggest change in our "ranking"). Miami at 11 makes no sense. [URL='http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/']Sagarin[/URL] has us in about the same area as VPI, UM, Duke, Syracuse, Pitt, UNC, and NCST in the 41-60 range. It has Duke, VPI, UM, and Syracuse ahead of us (and East Carolina almost tied with us). I think we moved up and VPI moved down a bit, but I can't find last weeks ratings, so I'm not sure how much. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is the last name of the current Head Football Coach?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
ESPN Notes on GT
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top