Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
End of Half Clock Management
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacketOff" data-source="post: 747119" data-attributes="member: 4572"><p>In UCF’s point-of-view, they had a 14 point lead with 1 minute and change on the clock from their own 25. <em>They </em>made the decision to be content with that lead and not risk turning it over (they fumbled their previous drive, leading to the GT score) especially knowing they were getting the ball to start the second half. The risk/reward decision they made is irrelevant to the decision that Tech made. They very easily could’ve pushed the envelope and at least tried to get into field goal range, but they didn’t.</p><p></p><p>Having a timeout to spend is nice, but our red zone offense has been awful over 2 years. Why would you limit yourself to only 3 plays to score, when you could have 4? Under no circumstances is 3 shots to score, better than 4.</p><p></p><p>A hypothetical situation for you. If you take the situation from Saturday’s game and modify it. Say Tech was down by 7 in the 4th quarter, but leave everything else the same, would you agree that spiking the ball would be a bad call in that situation?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacketOff, post: 747119, member: 4572"] In UCF’s point-of-view, they had a 14 point lead with 1 minute and change on the clock from their own 25. [I]They [/I]made the decision to be content with that lead and not risk turning it over (they fumbled their previous drive, leading to the GT score) especially knowing they were getting the ball to start the second half. The risk/reward decision they made is irrelevant to the decision that Tech made. They very easily could’ve pushed the envelope and at least tried to get into field goal range, but they didn’t. Having a timeout to spend is nice, but our red zone offense has been awful over 2 years. Why would you limit yourself to only 3 plays to score, when you could have 4? Under no circumstances is 3 shots to score, better than 4. A hypothetical situation for you. If you take the situation from Saturday’s game and modify it. Say Tech was down by 7 in the 4th quarter, but leave everything else the same, would you agree that spiking the ball would be a bad call in that situation? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Who was Georgia Tech's starting QB in 2023?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
End of Half Clock Management
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top