1. Welcome to Georgia Tech Swarm! JOIN US and be a part of the SWARM! GO JACKETS! THWg!

Duke Postgame: GT loses 41-23

Discussion in 'Georgia Tech Football' started by slugboy, Oct 12, 2019.

  1. slugboy

    slugboy Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    2,854
    Put your thoughts below...


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     
  2. Kennethshannon20

    Kennethshannon20 Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    97
    Patenaude is a joke. That's my only thought really ...
     
    TaxJacket, Jacketman, katlong and 3 others like this.
  3. techfan#14

    techfan#14 Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    52
    Not able to watch. Can someone please provide who/what looked good and what did not....
     
  4. jeffgt14

    jeffgt14 We Suck

    Messages:
    5,365
    What we had here boys was just better athletes and high rated recruits going up against us. We just couldn't overcome the vastly superior talent.
     
  5. smokey_wasp

    smokey_wasp Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    3,119
    Good second half. Graham is a man. Need bodies in the trenches.

    Thwg. Lol
     
    Silk3, GT14, Jacketman and 11 others like this.
  6. Milwaukee

    Milwaukee Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    4,812
    The experts nailed it. Irrational fans not so much.
     
    Wayxjacket, Lee, GT14 and 15 others like this.
  7. Coloradojacket

    Coloradojacket Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    1,073
    Moral Victory....no we still lost by a lot. Again, to much passing. Mason and Howard could have made this a game. All the three and outs in the first half meant game over. It doesn't get any easier.
     
    GTRanj2 likes this.
  8. Kmag

    Kmag Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    241
    Feeling better about offense, but we just don’t have the bodies up front on either side of the ball. There was a major difference in size and it was evident.
     
  9. rfjeff9

    rfjeff9 Jolly Good Fellow

    Messages:
    38
    Nothing has changed. It is a waiting game until we get players that can run this offense enrolled. FWIW, I guess the pre-season pundits were absolutely correct picking us last in the conference. I didn’t give credit to just how unsuited our linemen were to run pro style over diving at knees.
     
    Sheldon's likes this.
  10. Kennethshannon20

    Kennethshannon20 Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    97
    Graham showed, again, his ability to stay in the pocket. Overall, not a good pass/comp %, but still love him. Mason showed good ability to run and find gaps as usual. Again, we had some receivers miss some catchable passes. Rush defense still needs major improvement on the edge. Offense needs to learn to move faster. PNode still refuses to do what works.
     
    dmel25 and techfan#14 like this.
  11. braveswin11

    braveswin11 Georgia Tech Fan

    Messages:
    5
    Injuries on the offensive line really hurt, but liked the offense in general. Defense is disappointing, but also due to the lack of depth on the defensive line
     
    bobongo and smokey_wasp like this.
  12. HurricaneJacket

    HurricaneJacket Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    459
    If we can put together a full game defensively we may actually win something. That second qyarter was backbreaking.

    Graham looked good. When the line gave him time.

    Yates now apparently 2nd string QB.

    We ran 1 play under center, it was the end game spike.

    Tech has yet to coverthe spread.
     
  13. AE 87

    AE 87 Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    13,471
    This game showed how strong our O would've been with CPJ's scheme
     
    GT Bravo, katlong, GTRanj2 and 2 others like this.
  14. GTRhino24

    GTRhino24 GT Athlete

    Messages:
    148
    Mason and Howard looked great. Graham looked better but still missed some wide open TDs. Defense got tired again but played hard second half. Growth in most aspects but the line is still letting Graham get killed. SO to Oliver for taking on the new role and putting his team first. He needs more touches.
     
  15. TheTechGuy

    TheTechGuy Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    649
    Housed by Duke until they lost interest. Good news is that I've been informed it's all the players' fault. We just need an entire new team to compete, so I expect good games around 2023 - just around the corner.
     
  16. smokey_wasp

    smokey_wasp Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    3,119
    Yeah, needed to weather the storm in the 2nd quarter. That last pass would have beat the spread
     
  17. Kennethshannon20

    Kennethshannon20 Ramblin' Wreck

    Messages:
    97
    But a lot of that came from running....JS
     
  18. gotech82

    gotech82 Jolly Good Fellow

    Messages:
    6
    Too bad all of our fans can’t see the obvious like you do.
     
    Silk3, GT14, Southpawmac and 6 others like this.
  19. AUFC

    AUFC Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    832
    Our OL and DL need HGH and an unlimited supply of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, stat.

    We can probably pull off the 2nd one but the first will be tricky.
     
    GT14 likes this.
  20. Yaller Jacket

    Yaller Jacket Helluva Engineer

    Messages:
    787
    Kmag said it. Duke was more physical on both lines. We never competed in several short yardage situations. Duke got out to a big lead in the first half and just waited out the clock in the second. We did look better in the second half, but I don't know how much that had to do with Duke's lead. I suspect if we had ever gotten close they would have scored a lot more.

    I've lived through a lot of up and down eras, but it's hard to remember us being this bad.
     

Share This Page