Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Depth and Conditioning
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="33jacket" data-source="post: 49369" data-attributes="member: 628"><p>GT got tentative vs UGA then tired.</p><p></p><p>GT has always struggled with line depth...for many reasons mainly program/school related. I dont' think we have a conditioning issue, we simply don't have the rotation luxury most schools do, that can still compete at a decent level. Our dropoff is huge and a tired 70% gotsis is still better than his backup. sad but true, but its been this way forever at GT.</p><p></p><p>The only time I can recall it not really being this way was when Chan built his Ds. From the Anoai, oliver, roberson, wrotto line through to the walker, richard, johnson, oliver line we were always really salty up front and had good rotation depth with guys like anyaibe, a young mike johnson, etc. But Chan did build his d by prioritizing the recruits that way. He said it from the get go, the D will get the athletes first. Paul tends to try guys on O first. Did chans' lines struggle in some games. Sure, all D's do. But in general they were relatively solid and deep</p><p></p><p>FYI Oleary also put guys on O first. Paul and GOL both have had non-deep DL's in general over the years that notably could get worn out...They both had good single players, guys like gathers, stimson, attouchou etc, but as a 6-7 man unit it wasn't great</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="33jacket, post: 49369, member: 628"] GT got tentative vs UGA then tired. GT has always struggled with line depth...for many reasons mainly program/school related. I dont' think we have a conditioning issue, we simply don't have the rotation luxury most schools do, that can still compete at a decent level. Our dropoff is huge and a tired 70% gotsis is still better than his backup. sad but true, but its been this way forever at GT. The only time I can recall it not really being this way was when Chan built his Ds. From the Anoai, oliver, roberson, wrotto line through to the walker, richard, johnson, oliver line we were always really salty up front and had good rotation depth with guys like anyaibe, a young mike johnson, etc. But Chan did build his d by prioritizing the recruits that way. He said it from the get go, the D will get the athletes first. Paul tends to try guys on O first. Did chans' lines struggle in some games. Sure, all D's do. But in general they were relatively solid and deep FYI Oleary also put guys on O first. Paul and GOL both have had non-deep DL's in general over the years that notably could get worn out...They both had good single players, guys like gathers, stimson, attouchou etc, but as a 6-7 man unit it wasn't great [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Depth and Conditioning
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top