Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dedrick Mills Reflects
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RonJohn" data-source="post: 774113" data-attributes="member: 2426"><p>Are you sure about that? I found the updated policy (2018). <a href="https://ramblinwreck.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SA-Planner-SA-Alcohol-and-Drug-Program-Final.pdf" target="_blank">https://ramblinwreck.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SA-Planner-SA-Alcohol-and-Drug-Program-Final.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>As I recall, the athletic policy before this one called for a meeting with SA and parents and substance abuse counseling on a first positive, a meeting with SA and parents and 20% season suspension on the second positive, and expulsion from athletics on the third positive. I recall reading the previous policy off of the website in 2016. There is also an AJC article describing the changes to the athletic department policy in 2018. <a href="https://www.ajc.com/sports/college/georgia-tech-adjusts-substance-abuse-policy-for-athletes/XfjvFGWn83Cd8ZmWLtw4mL/" target="_blank">https://www.ajc.com/sports/college/georgia-tech-adjusts-substance-abuse-policy-for-athletes/XfjvFGWn83Cd8ZmWLtw4mL/</a></p><p></p><p>EDIT: BTW, even though it was an athletics policy, I don't think CPJ had any choice. I don't think the athletic department had any choice. Whether the policy is good or bad, if it is the policy it should be enforced equally whether if affects a walk-on scrub or the best player on the team. Integrity hurts sometimes, but having integrity is much more important than temporary gains in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RonJohn, post: 774113, member: 2426"] Are you sure about that? I found the updated policy (2018). [URL]https://ramblinwreck.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SA-Planner-SA-Alcohol-and-Drug-Program-Final.pdf[/URL] As I recall, the athletic policy before this one called for a meeting with SA and parents and substance abuse counseling on a first positive, a meeting with SA and parents and 20% season suspension on the second positive, and expulsion from athletics on the third positive. I recall reading the previous policy off of the website in 2016. There is also an AJC article describing the changes to the athletic department policy in 2018. [URL]https://www.ajc.com/sports/college/georgia-tech-adjusts-substance-abuse-policy-for-athletes/XfjvFGWn83Cd8ZmWLtw4mL/[/URL] EDIT: BTW, even though it was an athletics policy, I don't think CPJ had any choice. I don't think the athletic department had any choice. Whether the policy is good or bad, if it is the policy it should be enforced equally whether if affects a walk-on scrub or the best player on the team. Integrity hurts sometimes, but having integrity is much more important than temporary gains in my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What's the good word?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dedrick Mills Reflects
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top