Home
Articles
Photos
Interviews
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Georgia Tech Recruiting
Dashboard
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Chat
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slugboy" data-source="post: 753510" data-attributes="member: 282"><p>Just a little quibble—Satterfield and Collins are just different X and O people. </p><p></p><p>Satterfield is X’s and O’s on the offensive side. He’s been primarily an offensive coach, and was a former QB. Collins is an X’s and O’s coach on the defensive side, primarily coached defense his entire career, and was a linebacker. They’re different X’s and O’s, and I’d say Collins is as respected a defensive coach as Satterfield is on offense. </p><p></p><p>I thought Satterfield—or Satterfield’s OC—was doing good work against us last Friday. There were a couple of times that Louisville created schematic mismatches against us. I think we just have some better and more athletic players on offense and they played like they were better and more athletic. </p><p></p><p>Louisville was getting a bunch of hype at the beginning of the season, and was ranked for a while. They have a lot of positivity around their program, too. For Tech, coaches who know of Collins (including high school coaches) expect our defense to get crazy good in another year or two as conditioning and recruiting do their work. Some of the Tech positivity is because of a track record of good defense.</p><p></p><p>The offense becoming decent is a surprise bonus. With Collins, the expectation was that the offense would be passable and the defense would be really good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slugboy, post: 753510, member: 282"] Just a little quibble—Satterfield and Collins are just different X and O people. Satterfield is X’s and O’s on the offensive side. He’s been primarily an offensive coach, and was a former QB. Collins is an X’s and O’s coach on the defensive side, primarily coached defense his entire career, and was a linebacker. They’re different X’s and O’s, and I’d say Collins is as respected a defensive coach as Satterfield is on offense. I thought Satterfield—or Satterfield’s OC—was doing good work against us last Friday. There were a couple of times that Louisville created schematic mismatches against us. I think we just have some better and more athletic players on offense and they played like they were better and more athletic. Louisville was getting a bunch of hype at the beginning of the season, and was ranked for a while. They have a lot of positivity around their program, too. For Tech, coaches who know of Collins (including high school coaches) expect our defense to get crazy good in another year or two as conditioning and recruiting do their work. Some of the Tech positivity is because of a track record of good defense. The offense becoming decent is a surprise bonus. With Collins, the expectation was that the offense would be passable and the defense would be really good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
How many points did Georgia Tech score against Cumberland in 1916?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Georgia Tech Athletics
Georgia Tech Football
Dave Patenaude's Offense
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top