- Messages
- 10,063
- Location
- Williamsburg Virginia
I respectfully disagree that they left because they don't control the money anymore — they retired because the things that college sports used to be about (getting an education, creating long-term value for yourself, character development) are no longer present. It's just like Saban said after he stepped down; the recruits' mothers don't ask "are you going to care for my son" and "how are you going to help him grow" anymore, they say,"How much are you going to pay him". We would be naive to think that money in college hoops is new (case in point, the suspicious things around Duke and Zion) but it's also true that the sport has done a 180 in the past few years. College basketball is a wildly different sport than it was 15, 10, heck maybe even 5 years ago.
I don't blame those guys for wanting out. After all those years of hard work and winning, now they're relegated to negotiating with a bunch of 18 and 19-year-olds to keep them from entering the portal? Roy and K have earned the right to say no to that.
I went to a William & Mary presentation tonight and the Men's & Women's coaches there addressed this NIL & transfer issue. For W&M, they are selling the degree and have full scholarships. But NIL hasn't gotten there yet, the transfer portal has but not the full on NIL. The players they get are either going to stay or fleet up to Division 1 for the money. Its starting for men and probably later for women. But the key point they made (we've heard it), is that 4 years of W&M sets them up for 40 years of work.
There is still more "purity" at lower levels where it is more student athletes competing rather than mercenaries. But the mercenaries play better and provide more entertainment as well as alumni revenue for the schools.
Those coaches who have ethical problems with NIL could go down a level or two if they are called to coach.
Don't expect that to happen. So I'm tuned in with the @kg01 PoV.