I'mmore concerned about winning games than thinking about whether a 2nd year back is going toget drafted.
I'mmore concerned about winning games than thinking about whether a 2nd year back is going toget drafted.
The better question is, why are you concerned about what the situation for a running back willbe in 2 years? The future for Tech football is right now.What's with the coach speak? If you're not concerned with answering the question then why respond?
What's with the coach speak? If you're not concerned with answering the question then why respond?
I didn't get a chance to see the Pitt game until recently and thought that he has the potential to be a good slot receiver on the next level and I wanted to know what everyone thoughtThe better question is, why are you concerned about what the situation for a running back willbe in 2 years? The future for Tech football is right now.
As is it seems with others..
More concerned about stats and the O in 2023 than what will happen this week.
If Orwin had Clintons shiftiness he would have been a historic name at Tech. He had the top end speed to be dangerous. If Clinton can figure out a way to get faster, he has the ability to be a big asset for us. He has good instincts and avoids tacklers extremely well. Add some wt he could be a good B back. He has excellent quick vision. Any kind of positive conversation at this point should be welcomed.He feels kinda like Orwin Smith to me. Great playmaker in our offense, but limited pro prospects. I think he'll get into somebody's camp at least though.